Abstract
The introduction of geography as a separate discipline within the Australian
Curriculum offers hope for revitalisation of the subject in Australian school
education after decades of decline. Since the 1990s, the subject has been largely
submerged within an integrated curriculum framework that has had significant
consequences for the presence and character of secondary school geography. Its
inclusion in the learning area of SOSE (Studies of Society and Environment)
within schools has diluted the degree, breadth and depth of geographical education.
However, in spite of the hope provided by its re-institution, the process of
national curriculum construction has had disconcerting consequences for the type
of geography being offered to Australian students at the secondary level. Building
on critical overviews of the history of secondary geography as an Australian
school subject since the 1980s, recent philosophical discourse on approaches to
geographical knowledge in a school context, and the author?s personal experience
as a geographical educator and researcher, this paper argues that the nature of
knowledge embodied by the new geography study design inYears 7?10 is flawed
in both its scope and its direction. While reflecting many of the characteristics of
a social realist approach to geographical knowledge, the Australian Curriculum
minimises the elements of critical analysis that provide geography with its unique
educational identity and value.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 95 - 105 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Geographical Research |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver