Geography and international assessment: Opportunity or distraction

Joseph Stoltman, John Lidstone, Gillian Kidman

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialOtherpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Assessments of students in primary and secondary education are debated among practitioners, policy-makers, and parents. In some countries, assessment scores serve a criterion for passage between levels of education, for example, from secondary school to post-secondary education. Those practices are often traditions and while they come under criticism, they are a long-accepted part of the educational practices within a country. In those countries, the students’ assessment and examination scores are posted in public places or published in local news media. In other countries,assessments are used for the periodic checks on individual student progress. The results of assessments may be used for rating schools, and in some cases, they are used for evaluating the performance of teachers. Assessments are used less often to analyze student performance and make judgments regarding the performance of the curriculum. Even less often, assessments serve to critically establish strategies for the improvement of student learning and educational practices. The ends on the continuum of the assessment debate often focus on the opportunities that assessments present to improve education on one end. The other end is that assessments serve as a major distraction from the important work of teachers by removing classroom room time from instruction. The debate on those issues continues.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)193-196
    Number of pages4
    JournalInternational Research in Geographical and Environmental Education
    Volume23
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Cite this