TY - JOUR
T1 - Geographical variability in the likelihood of bloodstream infections due to gram-negative bacteria
T2 - Correlation with proximity to the equator and health care expenditure
AU - Fisman, David N
AU - Patrozou, Eleni
AU - Carmeli, Yehuda
AU - Perencevich, Eli
AU - Tuite, Ashleigh R.
AU - Mermel, Leonard A.
AU - the Geographical Variability of Bacteremia Study Group
AU - Quirós, Rodolfo E.
AU - Vilches, Viviana
AU - Korman, Tony M.
AU - Miyakis, Spyros
AU - Boutlis, Craig S
AU - Reid, Alistair Balfour
AU - Gales, Ana Cristina
AU - Schandert, Lygia
AU - Affini, Rafael
AU - Oliveira, Antonia Machado
AU - Marra, Alexandre R.
AU - Camargo, Luis Fernando Aranha
AU - Edmond, Michael B.
AU - Correa, Luci
AU - Sukiennik, Teresa Cristina Teixeira
AU - Behar, Paulo Renato Petersen
AU - Gira˜o, Evelyne
AU - Guerra, Carla
AU - Brites, Carlos
AU - de Souza, Marta Antunes
AU - McGeer, Allison J.
AU - Smith, Stephanie
AU - El Kholy, Amani A.
AU - Tacconelli, Evelina
AU - Plakias, George
AU - Honda, Hitoshi
AU - Kluytmans, Jan
AU - Apisarnthanarak, Anucha
AU - Fakih, Mohamad G.
AU - Marschall, Jonas
AU - Russo, Anthony J.
PY - 2014/12/1
Y1 - 2014/12/1
N2 - Objective: Infections due to Gram-negative bacteria exhibit seasonal trends, with peak infection rates during warmer months. We hypothesized that the likelihood of a bloodstream infection due to Gram-negative bacteria increases with proximity to the equator. We tested this hypothesis and identified geographical, climatic and social factors associated with this variability. Design: We established a network of 23 international centers in 22 cities. Setting: De-identified results of positive blood cultures from 2007-2011 and data sources for geographic, climatic and socioeconomic factors were assembled for each center. Participants: Patients at the 23 centers with positive blood cultures. Main outcome: Due to variability in the availability of total culture volumes across sites, our primary outcome measure was the fraction of positive blood cultures that yielded Gram-negative bacteria; sources of variability in this outcome measure were explored using meta-regression techniques. Results: The mean fraction of bacteremia associated with Gram-negative bacteria was 48.4% (range 26.4% to 61.8%). Although not all sites displayed significantseasonality, the overall P-value for seasonal oscillation was significant (P<0.001). In univariate meta-regression models, temperature, latitude, latitude squared, longitude, per capita gross domestic product and percent of gross domestic product spent on healthcare were all associated with the fraction of bacteremia due to Gram-negative bacteria. In multivariable models, only percent of gross domestic product spent on healthcare and distance from the equator (ie. latitude squared) were significantly associated with the fraction of bacteremia due to Gram-negative bacteria. Conclusions: The likelihood of bacteremia due to Gram-negative bacteria varies markedly between cities, in a manner that appears to have both geographic (latitude) and socioeconomic (proportion gross domestic product devoted to health spending) determinants. Thus, the optimal approach to initial management of suspected bacteremia may be geographically specific. The rapid emergence of highly antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative pathogens may have geographically specific impacts.
AB - Objective: Infections due to Gram-negative bacteria exhibit seasonal trends, with peak infection rates during warmer months. We hypothesized that the likelihood of a bloodstream infection due to Gram-negative bacteria increases with proximity to the equator. We tested this hypothesis and identified geographical, climatic and social factors associated with this variability. Design: We established a network of 23 international centers in 22 cities. Setting: De-identified results of positive blood cultures from 2007-2011 and data sources for geographic, climatic and socioeconomic factors were assembled for each center. Participants: Patients at the 23 centers with positive blood cultures. Main outcome: Due to variability in the availability of total culture volumes across sites, our primary outcome measure was the fraction of positive blood cultures that yielded Gram-negative bacteria; sources of variability in this outcome measure were explored using meta-regression techniques. Results: The mean fraction of bacteremia associated with Gram-negative bacteria was 48.4% (range 26.4% to 61.8%). Although not all sites displayed significantseasonality, the overall P-value for seasonal oscillation was significant (P<0.001). In univariate meta-regression models, temperature, latitude, latitude squared, longitude, per capita gross domestic product and percent of gross domestic product spent on healthcare were all associated with the fraction of bacteremia due to Gram-negative bacteria. In multivariable models, only percent of gross domestic product spent on healthcare and distance from the equator (ie. latitude squared) were significantly associated with the fraction of bacteremia due to Gram-negative bacteria. Conclusions: The likelihood of bacteremia due to Gram-negative bacteria varies markedly between cities, in a manner that appears to have both geographic (latitude) and socioeconomic (proportion gross domestic product devoted to health spending) determinants. Thus, the optimal approach to initial management of suspected bacteremia may be geographically specific. The rapid emergence of highly antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative pathogens may have geographically specific impacts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925702558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0114548
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0114548
M3 - Article
C2 - 25521300
AN - SCOPUS:84925702558
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 9
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 12
M1 - e114548
ER -