TY - JOUR
T1 - Genomic Risk Score impact on susceptibility to systemic sclerosis
AU - Bossini-Castillo, Lara
AU - Villanueva-Martin, Gonzalo
AU - Kerick, Martin
AU - Acosta-Herrera, Marialbert
AU - López-Isac, Elena
AU - Simeón, Carmen P.
AU - Ortego-Centeno, Norberto
AU - Assassi, Shervin
AU - Hunzelmann, Nicolas
AU - Gabrielli, Armando
AU - De Vries-Bouwstra, J. K.
AU - Allanore, Yannick
AU - Fonseca, Carmen
AU - Denton, Christopher P.
AU - Radstake, Timothy R.D.J.
AU - Alarcón-Riquelme, Marta Eugenia
AU - Beretta, Lorenzo
AU - Mayes, Maureen D.
AU - Martin, Javier
AU - International SSc Group
AU - the Australian Scleroderma Interest Group (ASIG)
AU - PRECISESADS Clinical Consortium
AU - PRECISESADS Flow Cytometry study group
AU - Sahhar, Joanne M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (grant ref. RTI2018101332-B-100), Red de Investigación en Inflamación y Enfermedades Reumáticas (RIER) from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (RD16/0012/0013), and EU/EFPIA/Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking PRECISESADS grant no. 115565. LBC and MAH were funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the Juan de la Cierva incorporation program (ref. IJC2018-038026-I and IJC2018-035131-I, respectively). GV-M was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the Ayudas para contratos predoctorales para la formación de doctores 2019 program (ref. RTI2018-101332-B-I00).
Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Objectives Genomic Risk Scores (GRS) successfully demonstrated the ability of genetics to identify those individuals at high risk for complex traits including immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We aimed to test the performance of GRS in the prediction of risk for systemic sclerosis (SSc) for the first time. Methods Allelic effects were obtained from the largest SSc Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) to date (9 095 SSc and 17 584 healthy controls with European ancestry). The best-fitting GRS was identified under the additive model in an independent cohort that comprised 400 patients with SSc and 571 controls. Additionally, GRS for clinical subtypes (limited cutaneous SSc and diffuse cutaneous SSc) and serological subtypes (anti-Topoisomerase positive (ATA+) and anti-centromere positive (ACA+)) were generated. We combined the estimated GRS with demographic and immunological parameters in a multivariate generalised linear model. Results The best-fitting SSc GRS included 33 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and discriminated between patients with SSc and controls (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC)=0.673). Moreover, the GRS differentiated between SSc and other IMIDs, such as rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's syndrome. Finally, the combination of GRS with age and immune cell counts significantly increased the performance of the model (AUC=0.787). While the SSc GRS was not able to discriminate between ATA+ and ACA+ patients (AUC<0.5), the serological subtype GRS, which was based on the allelic effects observed for the comparison between ACA+ and ATA+ patients, reached an AUC=0.693. Conclusions GRS was successfully implemented in SSc. The model discriminated between patients with SSc and controls or other IMIDs, confirming the potential of GRS to support early and differential diagnosis for SSc.
AB - Objectives Genomic Risk Scores (GRS) successfully demonstrated the ability of genetics to identify those individuals at high risk for complex traits including immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We aimed to test the performance of GRS in the prediction of risk for systemic sclerosis (SSc) for the first time. Methods Allelic effects were obtained from the largest SSc Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) to date (9 095 SSc and 17 584 healthy controls with European ancestry). The best-fitting GRS was identified under the additive model in an independent cohort that comprised 400 patients with SSc and 571 controls. Additionally, GRS for clinical subtypes (limited cutaneous SSc and diffuse cutaneous SSc) and serological subtypes (anti-Topoisomerase positive (ATA+) and anti-centromere positive (ACA+)) were generated. We combined the estimated GRS with demographic and immunological parameters in a multivariate generalised linear model. Results The best-fitting SSc GRS included 33 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and discriminated between patients with SSc and controls (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC)=0.673). Moreover, the GRS differentiated between SSc and other IMIDs, such as rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's syndrome. Finally, the combination of GRS with age and immune cell counts significantly increased the performance of the model (AUC=0.787). While the SSc GRS was not able to discriminate between ATA+ and ACA+ patients (AUC<0.5), the serological subtype GRS, which was based on the allelic effects observed for the comparison between ACA+ and ATA+ patients, reached an AUC=0.693. Conclusions GRS was successfully implemented in SSc. The model discriminated between patients with SSc and controls or other IMIDs, confirming the potential of GRS to support early and differential diagnosis for SSc.
KW - autoimmune diseases
KW - immune complex diseases
KW - scleroderma
KW - systemic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098060461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218558
DO - 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218558
M3 - Article
C2 - 33004331
AN - SCOPUS:85098060461
SN - 0003-4967
VL - 80
SP - 118
EP - 127
JO - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
JF - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
IS - 1
ER -