Generating action and responding to local issues: Collective efficacy in context

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Recent research suggests that communities can be collectively efficacious without dense networks and kith and kinship relations. Yet few studies examine how collective efficacy is generated and sustained in the absence of close social ties. Using in-depth interviews with local residents and key stakeholders in two collectively efficacious suburbs in Brisbane, Australia, this study explores the role of social ties and networks in shaping residents' sense of active engagement and perceptions of community capacity. Results suggest that strong social bonds among residents are not necessary for the development of social cohesion and informal social control. Instead, collective representations or symbols of 'community' provide residents with a sense of social cohesion, trust and a perceived willingness of others to respond to problems of crime and disorder. Yet there is limited evidence that these collectively efficacious communities comprise actively engaged residents. In both communities, participants report a strong reliance on key institutions and organisations to manage and respond to a variety of problems, from neighbourhood nuisances to crime and disorder. These findings suggest a more a nuanced understanding of collective efficacy theory is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-443
Number of pages21
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Collective efficacy
  • Community
  • Crime
  • Crime prevention
  • Social networks

Cite this

@article{58ecdc4148ce405bbbd92cc44148f671,
title = "Generating action and responding to local issues: Collective efficacy in context",
abstract = "Recent research suggests that communities can be collectively efficacious without dense networks and kith and kinship relations. Yet few studies examine how collective efficacy is generated and sustained in the absence of close social ties. Using in-depth interviews with local residents and key stakeholders in two collectively efficacious suburbs in Brisbane, Australia, this study explores the role of social ties and networks in shaping residents' sense of active engagement and perceptions of community capacity. Results suggest that strong social bonds among residents are not necessary for the development of social cohesion and informal social control. Instead, collective representations or symbols of 'community' provide residents with a sense of social cohesion, trust and a perceived willingness of others to respond to problems of crime and disorder. Yet there is limited evidence that these collectively efficacious communities comprise actively engaged residents. In both communities, participants report a strong reliance on key institutions and organisations to manage and respond to a variety of problems, from neighbourhood nuisances to crime and disorder. These findings suggest a more a nuanced understanding of collective efficacy theory is needed.",
keywords = "Collective efficacy, Community, Crime, Crime prevention, Social networks",
author = "Wickes, {Rebecca L.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1375/acri.43.3.423",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "423--443",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology",
issn = "0004-8658",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Generating action and responding to local issues : Collective efficacy in context. / Wickes, Rebecca L.

In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2010, p. 423-443.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generating action and responding to local issues

T2 - Collective efficacy in context

AU - Wickes, Rebecca L.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Recent research suggests that communities can be collectively efficacious without dense networks and kith and kinship relations. Yet few studies examine how collective efficacy is generated and sustained in the absence of close social ties. Using in-depth interviews with local residents and key stakeholders in two collectively efficacious suburbs in Brisbane, Australia, this study explores the role of social ties and networks in shaping residents' sense of active engagement and perceptions of community capacity. Results suggest that strong social bonds among residents are not necessary for the development of social cohesion and informal social control. Instead, collective representations or symbols of 'community' provide residents with a sense of social cohesion, trust and a perceived willingness of others to respond to problems of crime and disorder. Yet there is limited evidence that these collectively efficacious communities comprise actively engaged residents. In both communities, participants report a strong reliance on key institutions and organisations to manage and respond to a variety of problems, from neighbourhood nuisances to crime and disorder. These findings suggest a more a nuanced understanding of collective efficacy theory is needed.

AB - Recent research suggests that communities can be collectively efficacious without dense networks and kith and kinship relations. Yet few studies examine how collective efficacy is generated and sustained in the absence of close social ties. Using in-depth interviews with local residents and key stakeholders in two collectively efficacious suburbs in Brisbane, Australia, this study explores the role of social ties and networks in shaping residents' sense of active engagement and perceptions of community capacity. Results suggest that strong social bonds among residents are not necessary for the development of social cohesion and informal social control. Instead, collective representations or symbols of 'community' provide residents with a sense of social cohesion, trust and a perceived willingness of others to respond to problems of crime and disorder. Yet there is limited evidence that these collectively efficacious communities comprise actively engaged residents. In both communities, participants report a strong reliance on key institutions and organisations to manage and respond to a variety of problems, from neighbourhood nuisances to crime and disorder. These findings suggest a more a nuanced understanding of collective efficacy theory is needed.

KW - Collective efficacy

KW - Community

KW - Crime

KW - Crime prevention

KW - Social networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957833606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1375/acri.43.3.423

DO - 10.1375/acri.43.3.423

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 423

EP - 443

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology

SN - 0004-8658

IS - 3

ER -