TY - JOUR
T1 - Gasification of torrefied oil palm biomass in a fixed-bed reactor
T2 - effects of gasifying agents on product characteristics
AU - Chew, Jiuan Jing
AU - Soh, Megan
AU - Sunarso, Jaka
AU - Yong, Siek Ting
AU - Doshi, Veena
AU - Bhattacharya, Sankar
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Gasification represents an attractive pathway to generate fuel gas (i.e., syngas (H2 and CO) and hydrocarbons) from oil palm biomass in Malaysia. Torrefaction is introduced here to enhance the oil palm biomass properties prior to gasification. In this work, the effect of torrefaction on the gasification of three oil palm biomass, i.e., empty fruit bunches (EFB), mesocarp fibres (MF), and palm kernel shells (PKS) are evaluated. Two gasifying agents were used, i.e., CO2 and steam. The syngas lower heating values (LHVsyngas) for CO2 gasification and steam gasification were in the range of 0.35–1.67 MJ m−3 and 1.61–2.22 MJ m−3, respectively. Compared with EFB and MF, PKS is more effective for fuel gas production as indicated by the more dominant emission of light hydrocarbons (CH4, C2H4, and C2H6) in PKS case. Gasification efficiency was examined using carbon conversion efficiency (CCE) and cold gas efficiency (CGE). CCE ranges between 4% and 55.1% for CO2 gasification while CGE varies between 4.8% and 46.2% and 27.6% and 62.9% for CO2 gasification and steam gasification, respectively. Our results showed that higher concentration of gasifying agent promotes higher carbon conversion and that steam gasification provides higher thermal efficiency (CGE) compared to CO2 gasification.
AB - Gasification represents an attractive pathway to generate fuel gas (i.e., syngas (H2 and CO) and hydrocarbons) from oil palm biomass in Malaysia. Torrefaction is introduced here to enhance the oil palm biomass properties prior to gasification. In this work, the effect of torrefaction on the gasification of three oil palm biomass, i.e., empty fruit bunches (EFB), mesocarp fibres (MF), and palm kernel shells (PKS) are evaluated. Two gasifying agents were used, i.e., CO2 and steam. The syngas lower heating values (LHVsyngas) for CO2 gasification and steam gasification were in the range of 0.35–1.67 MJ m−3 and 1.61–2.22 MJ m−3, respectively. Compared with EFB and MF, PKS is more effective for fuel gas production as indicated by the more dominant emission of light hydrocarbons (CH4, C2H4, and C2H6) in PKS case. Gasification efficiency was examined using carbon conversion efficiency (CCE) and cold gas efficiency (CGE). CCE ranges between 4% and 55.1% for CO2 gasification while CGE varies between 4.8% and 46.2% and 27.6% and 62.9% for CO2 gasification and steam gasification, respectively. Our results showed that higher concentration of gasifying agent promotes higher carbon conversion and that steam gasification provides higher thermal efficiency (CGE) compared to CO2 gasification.
KW - Fixed-bed reactor
KW - Gasification
KW - Oil palm biomass
KW - Torrefaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066870877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joei.2019.05.010
DO - 10.1016/j.joei.2019.05.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85066870877
SN - 1743-9671
VL - 93
SP - 711
EP - 722
JO - Journal of the Energy Institute
JF - Journal of the Energy Institute
IS - 2
ER -