TY - JOUR
T1 - GARCH and volume effects in the Australian stock markets
AU - Xiao, Jingliang
AU - Brooks, Robert D.
AU - Wong, Wing Keung
N1 - Funding Information:
For their helpful discussion and feedback, we thank Noor Abo Mokh, Daniel Dakota, Sandra K?bler, Lwin Moe, Larry Moss, Dragomir Radev, and audiences at the Workshop on Computational Phonology and Morphology 2015 and the CLingDing discussion group at Indiana University, as well as three anonymous reviewers.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2009 World Scientific Publishing Company.
PY - 2009/6/1
Y1 - 2009/6/1
N2 - This paper explores the relationship between volume and volatility in the Australian Stock Market in the context of a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model. In contrast to other studies who only examine the interaction of GARCH and volume effects on a small number of stocks, we examine these effects on the entire available data for the Australian All Ordinaries Index. We also emphasize on the impact of firm size and trading volume. Our results indicate that GARCH model testing and estimation is impacted by firm size and trading volume. Specifically, our analysis produces the following major findings. First, generally, daily trading volume, used as a proxy for information arrival time, is shown to have significant explanatory power regarding the variance of daily returns. Second, the actively traded stocks which may have a larger number of information arrivals per day have a larger impact of volume on the variance of daily returns. Third, we find that low trading volume and small firm lead to a higher persistence of GARCH effects in the estimated models. Fourth, unlike the elimination effect for the top most active stocks, in general, the elimination of both autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) and GARCH effects by introducing the volume variable on all other stocks on average is not as much as that for the top most active stocks. Fifth, the elimination of both ARCH and GARCH effects by introducing the volume variable is higher for stocks in the largest volume and/or the largest market capitalization quartile group. Our findings imply that the earlier findings in the literature were not a statistical fluke and that, unlike most anomalies, the volume effect on volatility is not likely to be eliminated after its discovery. In addition, our findings reject the pure random walk hypothesis for stock returns.
AB - This paper explores the relationship between volume and volatility in the Australian Stock Market in the context of a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model. In contrast to other studies who only examine the interaction of GARCH and volume effects on a small number of stocks, we examine these effects on the entire available data for the Australian All Ordinaries Index. We also emphasize on the impact of firm size and trading volume. Our results indicate that GARCH model testing and estimation is impacted by firm size and trading volume. Specifically, our analysis produces the following major findings. First, generally, daily trading volume, used as a proxy for information arrival time, is shown to have significant explanatory power regarding the variance of daily returns. Second, the actively traded stocks which may have a larger number of information arrivals per day have a larger impact of volume on the variance of daily returns. Third, we find that low trading volume and small firm lead to a higher persistence of GARCH effects in the estimated models. Fourth, unlike the elimination effect for the top most active stocks, in general, the elimination of both autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) and GARCH effects by introducing the volume variable on all other stocks on average is not as much as that for the top most active stocks. Fifth, the elimination of both ARCH and GARCH effects by introducing the volume variable is higher for stocks in the largest volume and/or the largest market capitalization quartile group. Our findings imply that the earlier findings in the literature were not a statistical fluke and that, unlike most anomalies, the volume effect on volatility is not likely to be eliminated after its discovery. In addition, our findings reject the pure random walk hypothesis for stock returns.
KW - Australian stock market
KW - GARCH models
KW - individual stock
KW - volatility
KW - volume
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081674717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1142/S2010495209500055
DO - 10.1142/S2010495209500055
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081674717
VL - 5
JO - Annals of Financial Economics
JF - Annals of Financial Economics
SN - 2010-4952
IS - 1
M1 - 0950005
ER -