Games as (not) culture: a critical policy analysis of the economic agenda of horizon 2020

Carlo Perrotta, Chris Bailey, Jim Ryder, Mata Haggis-Burridge, Donatella Persico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article presents a critical examination of European policy in relation to gamification. We begin by describing how gamification “traveled” as an idea, evolving from controversial yet persuasive buzzword to legitimate policy priority. We then focus on how gamification was represented in Horizon 2020: the flagship European Research & Development program from 2014 to 2020, worth nearly €80 billion of funding. The article argues that the ethically problematic aspects of gamification were removed through a process of policy capture that involved its assimilation in an established European network of research and small and medium enterprise (SME) actors. This process of “ethical neutering” is also observable in the actual funding calls, where the problematic assumptions of gamification around agency and manipulation are made invisible through a superficial commitment to vague and ill-defined criteria of responsible research and innovation.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages21
JournalGames and Culture: a journal of interactive media
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019

Keywords

  • gaming
  • gamification
  • ethics
  • discourse analysis
  • mobilities
  • Horizon 2020
  • responsible research and innovation

Cite this

@article{d996655508524eaab0960e4b3b19191a,
title = "Games as (not) culture: a critical policy analysis of the economic agenda of horizon 2020",
abstract = "This article presents a critical examination of European policy in relation to gamification. We begin by describing how gamification “traveled” as an idea, evolving from controversial yet persuasive buzzword to legitimate policy priority. We then focus on how gamification was represented in Horizon 2020: the flagship European Research & Development program from 2014 to 2020, worth nearly €80 billion of funding. The article argues that the ethically problematic aspects of gamification were removed through a process of policy capture that involved its assimilation in an established European network of research and small and medium enterprise (SME) actors. This process of “ethical neutering” is also observable in the actual funding calls, where the problematic assumptions of gamification around agency and manipulation are made invisible through a superficial commitment to vague and ill-defined criteria of responsible research and innovation.",
keywords = "gaming, gamification, ethics, discourse analysis, mobilities, Horizon 2020, responsible research and innovation",
author = "Carlo Perrotta and Chris Bailey and Jim Ryder and Mata Haggis-Burridge and Donatella Persico",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/1555412019853899",
language = "English",
journal = "Games and Culture: a journal of interactive media",
issn = "1555-4120",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Games as (not) culture : a critical policy analysis of the economic agenda of horizon 2020. / Perrotta, Carlo; Bailey, Chris ; Ryder, Jim; Haggis-Burridge, Mata; Persico, Donatella.

In: Games and Culture: a journal of interactive media, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Games as (not) culture

T2 - a critical policy analysis of the economic agenda of horizon 2020

AU - Perrotta, Carlo

AU - Bailey, Chris

AU - Ryder, Jim

AU - Haggis-Burridge, Mata

AU - Persico, Donatella

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article presents a critical examination of European policy in relation to gamification. We begin by describing how gamification “traveled” as an idea, evolving from controversial yet persuasive buzzword to legitimate policy priority. We then focus on how gamification was represented in Horizon 2020: the flagship European Research & Development program from 2014 to 2020, worth nearly €80 billion of funding. The article argues that the ethically problematic aspects of gamification were removed through a process of policy capture that involved its assimilation in an established European network of research and small and medium enterprise (SME) actors. This process of “ethical neutering” is also observable in the actual funding calls, where the problematic assumptions of gamification around agency and manipulation are made invisible through a superficial commitment to vague and ill-defined criteria of responsible research and innovation.

AB - This article presents a critical examination of European policy in relation to gamification. We begin by describing how gamification “traveled” as an idea, evolving from controversial yet persuasive buzzword to legitimate policy priority. We then focus on how gamification was represented in Horizon 2020: the flagship European Research & Development program from 2014 to 2020, worth nearly €80 billion of funding. The article argues that the ethically problematic aspects of gamification were removed through a process of policy capture that involved its assimilation in an established European network of research and small and medium enterprise (SME) actors. This process of “ethical neutering” is also observable in the actual funding calls, where the problematic assumptions of gamification around agency and manipulation are made invisible through a superficial commitment to vague and ill-defined criteria of responsible research and innovation.

KW - gaming

KW - gamification

KW - ethics

KW - discourse analysis

KW - mobilities

KW - Horizon 2020

KW - responsible research and innovation

U2 - 10.1177/1555412019853899

DO - 10.1177/1555412019853899

M3 - Article

JO - Games and Culture: a journal of interactive media

JF - Games and Culture: a journal of interactive media

SN - 1555-4120

ER -