Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the mass-metallicity relationship

C Foster, Andrew Mark Hopkins, Madusha Gunawardhana, Maritza A Lara-Lopez, Rob Sharp, O Steele, Edward Taylor, Simon P Driver, Ivan K Baldry, Steven P Bamford, J Liske, J Loveday, Peder Norberg, John A Peacock, M Alpasian, A Bauer, Jonathan Bland-Hawthorn, Sarah Brough, Ewan Cameron, Matthew CollessChristopher J Conselice, Scott Martin Croom, C S Frenk, David T Hill, David Heath Jones, L Kelvin, K Kuijken, Robert C Nichol, Matthew S Owers, H Parkinson, Kevin Alan Pimbblet, Cristina Popescu, Matthew Prescott, A S G Robotham, Angel R Lopez-Sanchez, W J Sutherland, D Thomas, R Tuffs, E van Kampen, Dinuka Wijesinghe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    37 Citations (Scopus)


    Context. The mass-metallicity relationship (MMR) of star-forming galaxies is well-established, however there is still some disagreement with respect to its exact shape and its possible dependence on other observables. Aims.We measure the MMR in the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. We compare our measured MMR to that measured in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and study the dependence of the MMR on various selection criteria to identify potential causes for disparities seen in the literature. Methods.We use strong emission line ratio diagnostics to derive oxygen abundances. We then apply a range of selection criteria for the minimum signal-to-noise in various emission lines, as well as the apparent and absolute magnitude to study variations in the inferred MMR. Results. The shape and position of the MMR can differ significantly depending on the metallicity calibration and selection used. After selecting a robust metallicity calibration amongst those tested, we find that the mass-metallicity relation for redshifts 0.061 less than of the order of z less than of the order of 0.35 in GAMA is in reasonable agreement with that found in the SDSS despite the difference in the luminosity range probed. Conclusions. In view of the significant variations of the MMR brought about by reasonable changes in the sample selection criteria and method, we recommend that care be taken when comparing the MMR from different surveys and studies directly. We also conclude that there could be a modest level of evolution over 0.06 less than or equal to z less than or equal to 0.35 within the GAMA sample.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1 - 9
    Number of pages9
    JournalAstronomy & Astrophysics
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Cite this