Fuzzy portfolio allocation models through a new risk measure and fuzzy Sharpe ratio

Thanh Thi Nguyen, Lee Nigel Gordon-Brown, Abbas Khosravi, Douglas Creighton, Saeid Nahavandi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A new portfolio risk measure that is the uncertainty of portfolio fuzzy return is introduced in this paper. Beyond the wellknown Sharpe ratio (i.e., the reward-to-variability ratio) in modern portfolio theory, we initiate the so-called fuzzy Sharpe ratio in the fuzzy modeling context. In addition to the introduction of the new risk measure, we also put forward the reward-to-uncertainty ratio to assess the portfolio performance in fuzzy modeling. Corresponding to two approaches based on TM and TW fuzzy arithmetic, two portfolio optimization models are formulated in which the uncertainty of portfolio fuzzy returns is minimized, while the fuzzy Sharpe ratio is maximized. These models are solved by the fuzzy approach or by the genetic algorithm (GA). Solutions of the two proposed models are shown to be dominant in terms of portfolio return uncertainty compared with those of the conventional mean-variance optimization (MVO) model used prevalently in the financial literature. In terms of portfolio performance evaluated by the fuzzy Sharpe ratio and the reward-to-uncertainty ratio, the model using TW fuzzy arithmetic results in higher performance portfolios than those obtained by both the MVO and the fuzzy model, which employs TM fuzzy arithmetic. We also find that using the fuzzy approach for solving multiobjective problems appears to achievemore optimal solutions than using GA, although GA can offer a series of well-diversified portfolio solutions diagrammed in a Pareto frontier.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)656 - 676
Number of pages21
JournalIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

Nguyen, T. T., Gordon-Brown, L. N., Khosravi, A., Creighton, D., & Nahavandi, S. (2015). Fuzzy portfolio allocation models through a new risk measure and fuzzy Sharpe ratio. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 23(3), 656 - 676. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2321614
Nguyen, Thanh Thi ; Gordon-Brown, Lee Nigel ; Khosravi, Abbas ; Creighton, Douglas ; Nahavandi, Saeid. / Fuzzy portfolio allocation models through a new risk measure and fuzzy Sharpe ratio. In: IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2015 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 656 - 676.
@article{2791ed05150b4b8d897e7ba852fc8818,
title = "Fuzzy portfolio allocation models through a new risk measure and fuzzy Sharpe ratio",
abstract = "A new portfolio risk measure that is the uncertainty of portfolio fuzzy return is introduced in this paper. Beyond the wellknown Sharpe ratio (i.e., the reward-to-variability ratio) in modern portfolio theory, we initiate the so-called fuzzy Sharpe ratio in the fuzzy modeling context. In addition to the introduction of the new risk measure, we also put forward the reward-to-uncertainty ratio to assess the portfolio performance in fuzzy modeling. Corresponding to two approaches based on TM and TW fuzzy arithmetic, two portfolio optimization models are formulated in which the uncertainty of portfolio fuzzy returns is minimized, while the fuzzy Sharpe ratio is maximized. These models are solved by the fuzzy approach or by the genetic algorithm (GA). Solutions of the two proposed models are shown to be dominant in terms of portfolio return uncertainty compared with those of the conventional mean-variance optimization (MVO) model used prevalently in the financial literature. In terms of portfolio performance evaluated by the fuzzy Sharpe ratio and the reward-to-uncertainty ratio, the model using TW fuzzy arithmetic results in higher performance portfolios than those obtained by both the MVO and the fuzzy model, which employs TM fuzzy arithmetic. We also find that using the fuzzy approach for solving multiobjective problems appears to achievemore optimal solutions than using GA, although GA can offer a series of well-diversified portfolio solutions diagrammed in a Pareto frontier.",
author = "Nguyen, {Thanh Thi} and Gordon-Brown, {Lee Nigel} and Abbas Khosravi and Douglas Creighton and Saeid Nahavandi",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2321614",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "656 -- 676",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems",
issn = "1063-6706",
publisher = "IEEE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers",
number = "3",

}

Nguyen, TT, Gordon-Brown, LN, Khosravi, A, Creighton, D & Nahavandi, S 2015, 'Fuzzy portfolio allocation models through a new risk measure and fuzzy Sharpe ratio' IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 656 - 676. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2321614

Fuzzy portfolio allocation models through a new risk measure and fuzzy Sharpe ratio. / Nguyen, Thanh Thi; Gordon-Brown, Lee Nigel; Khosravi, Abbas; Creighton, Douglas; Nahavandi, Saeid.

In: IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2015, p. 656 - 676.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fuzzy portfolio allocation models through a new risk measure and fuzzy Sharpe ratio

AU - Nguyen, Thanh Thi

AU - Gordon-Brown, Lee Nigel

AU - Khosravi, Abbas

AU - Creighton, Douglas

AU - Nahavandi, Saeid

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - A new portfolio risk measure that is the uncertainty of portfolio fuzzy return is introduced in this paper. Beyond the wellknown Sharpe ratio (i.e., the reward-to-variability ratio) in modern portfolio theory, we initiate the so-called fuzzy Sharpe ratio in the fuzzy modeling context. In addition to the introduction of the new risk measure, we also put forward the reward-to-uncertainty ratio to assess the portfolio performance in fuzzy modeling. Corresponding to two approaches based on TM and TW fuzzy arithmetic, two portfolio optimization models are formulated in which the uncertainty of portfolio fuzzy returns is minimized, while the fuzzy Sharpe ratio is maximized. These models are solved by the fuzzy approach or by the genetic algorithm (GA). Solutions of the two proposed models are shown to be dominant in terms of portfolio return uncertainty compared with those of the conventional mean-variance optimization (MVO) model used prevalently in the financial literature. In terms of portfolio performance evaluated by the fuzzy Sharpe ratio and the reward-to-uncertainty ratio, the model using TW fuzzy arithmetic results in higher performance portfolios than those obtained by both the MVO and the fuzzy model, which employs TM fuzzy arithmetic. We also find that using the fuzzy approach for solving multiobjective problems appears to achievemore optimal solutions than using GA, although GA can offer a series of well-diversified portfolio solutions diagrammed in a Pareto frontier.

AB - A new portfolio risk measure that is the uncertainty of portfolio fuzzy return is introduced in this paper. Beyond the wellknown Sharpe ratio (i.e., the reward-to-variability ratio) in modern portfolio theory, we initiate the so-called fuzzy Sharpe ratio in the fuzzy modeling context. In addition to the introduction of the new risk measure, we also put forward the reward-to-uncertainty ratio to assess the portfolio performance in fuzzy modeling. Corresponding to two approaches based on TM and TW fuzzy arithmetic, two portfolio optimization models are formulated in which the uncertainty of portfolio fuzzy returns is minimized, while the fuzzy Sharpe ratio is maximized. These models are solved by the fuzzy approach or by the genetic algorithm (GA). Solutions of the two proposed models are shown to be dominant in terms of portfolio return uncertainty compared with those of the conventional mean-variance optimization (MVO) model used prevalently in the financial literature. In terms of portfolio performance evaluated by the fuzzy Sharpe ratio and the reward-to-uncertainty ratio, the model using TW fuzzy arithmetic results in higher performance portfolios than those obtained by both the MVO and the fuzzy model, which employs TM fuzzy arithmetic. We also find that using the fuzzy approach for solving multiobjective problems appears to achievemore optimal solutions than using GA, although GA can offer a series of well-diversified portfolio solutions diagrammed in a Pareto frontier.

U2 - 10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2321614

DO - 10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2321614

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 656

EP - 676

JO - IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

JF - IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

SN - 1063-6706

IS - 3

ER -