Abstract
We consider two aspects of gambling with the Kelly criterion. Firstly,
we show that for a wide range of final results for a series of games,
the Kelly bettor would be worse off compared to a flat bets bettor.
Secondly, we consider, for the Kelly bettor, situations similar to the
gambler s (or his opponent s) ruin in the classical gambler s ruin
problem. Here the end points are a reduction of the gambler s capital
to a fraction, or its growth to a certain multiple, of its original
value.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 47 - 56 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | The Mathematical Scientist |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |