Abstract
In this commentary, I confront Ganeri’s theory of self with two case studies from cognitive neuroscience and interdisciplinary consciousness research: mind wandering and full-body illusions. Together, these case studies suggest new
questions and constraints for Ganeri’s theory of self. Recent research on spontaneous thought and mind wandering raises questions about the transition from unconscious monitoring to the phenomenology of ownership and the first-person stance. Full-body illusions are relevant for the attenuation problem of how we distinguish between self and others. Discussing these examples can help refine key transitions in Ganeri’s theory of self and ensure its empirical plausibility. This discussion also identifies points of contact between Ganeri’s self and cognitive neuroscience, raising new questions for future research, both philosophical and empirical.
questions and constraints for Ganeri’s theory of self. Recent research on spontaneous thought and mind wandering raises questions about the transition from unconscious monitoring to the phenomenology of ownership and the first-person stance. Full-body illusions are relevant for the attenuation problem of how we distinguish between self and others. Discussing these examples can help refine key transitions in Ganeri’s theory of self and ensure its empirical plausibility. This discussion also identifies points of contact between Ganeri’s self and cognitive neuroscience, raising new questions for future research, both philosophical and empirical.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1721–1733 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Philosophical Studies |
Volume | 174 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- Self-consciousness
- Attention
- Ownership
- Spontaneous thought
- Mind wandering
- Dreaming
- Full-body illusions
- Virtual reality