Abstract
This article examines the evolution of the discourse surrounding domestic violence (DV), explores how that discourse intersects with public child welfare (PCW), and makes some suggestions for improving the quality and consistency of services for families involved with these systems in both the United States and Canada. In particular, the discourse at the intersection of the two systems has focused on whether or not children's exposure to DV is maltreatment and, further, if it warrants placement in foster care. Within the PCW system itself, data seem to point to divisions in worker beliefs over what circumstances necessitate removal of children and what solutions should be pursued in order to achieve permanence. Legislation and courts have spoken to this complex issue. Given the tension and new developments in the field, this article proposes that harm reduction (HR), evidence-based practice (EBP), and differential response (DR) approaches can bring the two systems together in order to better serve families.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 689-698 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Children and Youth Services Review |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Child abuse
- Child maltreatment
- Differential response
- Domestic violence
- Evidence-based practice
- Harm reduction
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver