Fractures in spina bifida from childhood to young adulthood

A. Trinh, P. Wong, J. Brown, S. Hennel, P. R. Ebeling, P. J. Fuller, F. Milat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: This study assessed the prevalence and types of fractures in spina bifida and examined risk factors for fracture. Fracture prevalence was highest in childhood and reduced in adolescence and young adulthood. The importance of maintaining mobility is highlighted by the increased risk of fracture in those who are non-ambulatory. Introduction: The aims of this study are to study the prevalence and types of fractures according to age group in spina bifida and examine risk factors associated with fracture. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 146 individuals with spina bifida aged 2 years or older who attended the paediatric or adult spina bifida multidisciplinary clinic at a single tertiary hospital. Results: Median age at which first fracture occurred was 7 years (interquartile range 4–13 years). Fracture rates in children (ages 2–10), adolescents (ages 11–18) and adults (age > 18) were 10.9/1000 (95 % confidence interval 5.9–18.3), 5.4/1000 (95 % CI 1.5–13.8) and 2.9/1000 (95 % CI 0.6–8.1) patient years respectively. Childhood fractures predominantly involved the distal femur and femoral shaft; these fractures were rarely seen in adulthood. Non-ambulatory status was associated with a 9.8 times higher risk of fracture compared with ambulatory patients (odds ratio 9.8, p = 0.016, 95 % CI 1.5–63.0). Relative risk of re-fracture was 3.1 (95 % CI 1.4–6.8). Urological intervention with intestinal segments was associated with renal calculi (p = 0.037) but neither was associated with fracture. Conclusions: The risk of fracture is lower in adults compared with children with spina bifida. The predominant childhood fracture affects the distal femur, and immobility is the most significant risk factor for fracture. Clinical factors contributing to fracture risk need to be elucidated to enable selection of patients who require investigation and treatment of osteoporosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)399-406
Number of pages8
JournalOsteoporosis International
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Fracture
  • Immobility
  • Spina bifida
  • Urological intervention

Cite this