Flipped learning–a case study of enhanced student success

Thomas Simko, Isaac Pinar, Ashlee Pearson, Jiachun Huang, George Mutch, Ahmed Sanjid Patwary, Mathew Lui, Josie Carberry, Kris Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This study presents the benefits of changing the delivery of a second-year engineering course from the traditional lecture-based format to the flipped approach that is becoming increasingly embraced by universities. The new format involved replacing theoretical lectures with online recordings and devoting the class time to working through problems (workshops). These workshops were complemented by pre- and post-class activities. The success of this change is measured by comparing the outcomes of the flipped and traditional offerings of the same course. This comparison reveals the following benefits from flipping the course: higher marks; improved engagement; and widespread student satisfaction with the flipped format based on student feedback. These outcomes are compared with those reported in the literature for similar teaching approaches. This paper differs from most previous studies by considering all of these outcomes together for one course. The detailed explanation of how the course was flipped provides a model that can be applied to successfully flip other courses. This paper concludes by provocatively raising several key issues that are surprisingly absent or glossed over in the literature. Further studies of these issues are proposed to make a firm case for flipped learning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-47
Number of pages13
JournalAustralasian Journal of Engineering Education
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • blended learning
  • Flipped learning
  • workshops

Cite this

Simko, Thomas ; Pinar, Isaac ; Pearson, Ashlee ; Huang, Jiachun ; Mutch, George ; Patwary, Ahmed Sanjid ; Lui, Mathew ; Carberry, Josie ; Ryan, Kris. / Flipped learning–a case study of enhanced student success. In: Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. 2019 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 35-47.
@article{303e62fe14994fe4b95432fe1368827a,
title = "Flipped learning–a case study of enhanced student success",
abstract = "This study presents the benefits of changing the delivery of a second-year engineering course from the traditional lecture-based format to the flipped approach that is becoming increasingly embraced by universities. The new format involved replacing theoretical lectures with online recordings and devoting the class time to working through problems (workshops). These workshops were complemented by pre- and post-class activities. The success of this change is measured by comparing the outcomes of the flipped and traditional offerings of the same course. This comparison reveals the following benefits from flipping the course: higher marks; improved engagement; and widespread student satisfaction with the flipped format based on student feedback. These outcomes are compared with those reported in the literature for similar teaching approaches. This paper differs from most previous studies by considering all of these outcomes together for one course. The detailed explanation of how the course was flipped provides a model that can be applied to successfully flip other courses. This paper concludes by provocatively raising several key issues that are surprisingly absent or glossed over in the literature. Further studies of these issues are proposed to make a firm case for flipped learning.",
keywords = "blended learning, Flipped learning, workshops",
author = "Thomas Simko and Isaac Pinar and Ashlee Pearson and Jiachun Huang and George Mutch and Patwary, {Ahmed Sanjid} and Mathew Lui and Josie Carberry and Kris Ryan",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/22054952.2019.1617650",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "35--47",
journal = "Australasian Journal of Engineering Education",
issn = "1324-5821",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Flipped learning–a case study of enhanced student success. / Simko, Thomas; Pinar, Isaac; Pearson, Ashlee; Huang, Jiachun; Mutch, George; Patwary, Ahmed Sanjid; Lui, Mathew; Carberry, Josie; Ryan, Kris.

In: Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, 02.01.2019, p. 35-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flipped learning–a case study of enhanced student success

AU - Simko, Thomas

AU - Pinar, Isaac

AU - Pearson, Ashlee

AU - Huang, Jiachun

AU - Mutch, George

AU - Patwary, Ahmed Sanjid

AU - Lui, Mathew

AU - Carberry, Josie

AU - Ryan, Kris

PY - 2019/1/2

Y1 - 2019/1/2

N2 - This study presents the benefits of changing the delivery of a second-year engineering course from the traditional lecture-based format to the flipped approach that is becoming increasingly embraced by universities. The new format involved replacing theoretical lectures with online recordings and devoting the class time to working through problems (workshops). These workshops were complemented by pre- and post-class activities. The success of this change is measured by comparing the outcomes of the flipped and traditional offerings of the same course. This comparison reveals the following benefits from flipping the course: higher marks; improved engagement; and widespread student satisfaction with the flipped format based on student feedback. These outcomes are compared with those reported in the literature for similar teaching approaches. This paper differs from most previous studies by considering all of these outcomes together for one course. The detailed explanation of how the course was flipped provides a model that can be applied to successfully flip other courses. This paper concludes by provocatively raising several key issues that are surprisingly absent or glossed over in the literature. Further studies of these issues are proposed to make a firm case for flipped learning.

AB - This study presents the benefits of changing the delivery of a second-year engineering course from the traditional lecture-based format to the flipped approach that is becoming increasingly embraced by universities. The new format involved replacing theoretical lectures with online recordings and devoting the class time to working through problems (workshops). These workshops were complemented by pre- and post-class activities. The success of this change is measured by comparing the outcomes of the flipped and traditional offerings of the same course. This comparison reveals the following benefits from flipping the course: higher marks; improved engagement; and widespread student satisfaction with the flipped format based on student feedback. These outcomes are compared with those reported in the literature for similar teaching approaches. This paper differs from most previous studies by considering all of these outcomes together for one course. The detailed explanation of how the course was flipped provides a model that can be applied to successfully flip other courses. This paper concludes by provocatively raising several key issues that are surprisingly absent or glossed over in the literature. Further studies of these issues are proposed to make a firm case for flipped learning.

KW - blended learning

KW - Flipped learning

KW - workshops

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068700782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/22054952.2019.1617650

DO - 10.1080/22054952.2019.1617650

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 35

EP - 47

JO - Australasian Journal of Engineering Education

JF - Australasian Journal of Engineering Education

SN - 1324-5821

IS - 1

ER -