Flexible Work Organisation

Inferences from Britain and Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Against the background of much debate in Australia and New Zealand about micro‐economic reform and award restructuring, this article outlines several critical analyses of fragmented work organisation. From eight types of employment flexibility (summarised in an appendix), it focuses on job flexibility, and argues that employers in an adversarial (Type I) industrial relations context tend to have less job (functional) flexibility but more numerical flexibility than those in a more consensual (Type II) context. Yet there have been recent moves towards greater job flexibility in Australia, Britain and other English‐speaking countries, which can be characterised as having traditionally provided a predominantly adversarial context. Some such moves have been associated with Japanese influences and new styles of industrial awards and agreements. The article includes four propositions which may guide future research. It proposes longitudinal research on job flexibility, using an audit of work organisation. Such an audit could be of benefit to practitioners and to those seeking to explain changing forms of work organisation. 

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-44
Number of pages17
JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1990

Keywords

  • Britain
  • Australia
  • micro‐economic reform
  • award restructuring
  • work organisation
  • flexibility
  • industrial relations
  • functional flexibility
  • numerical flexibility
  • consensual
  • adversarial
  • Japanese management
  • Workplace change

Cite this

@article{d26ce5c47f0e4c8f9349e269b6a55bd1,
title = "Flexible Work Organisation: Inferences from Britain and Australia",
abstract = "Against the background of much debate in Australia and New Zealand about micro‐economic reform and award restructuring, this article outlines several critical analyses of fragmented work organisation. From eight types of employment flexibility (summarised in an appendix), it focuses on job flexibility, and argues that employers in an adversarial (Type I) industrial relations context tend to have less job (functional) flexibility but more numerical flexibility than those in a more consensual (Type II) context. Yet there have been recent moves towards greater job flexibility in Australia, Britain and other English‐speaking countries, which can be characterised as having traditionally provided a predominantly adversarial context. Some such moves have been associated with Japanese influences and new styles of industrial awards and agreements. The article includes four propositions which may guide future research. It proposes longitudinal research on job flexibility, using an audit of work organisation. Such an audit could be of benefit to practitioners and to those seeking to explain changing forms of work organisation. ",
keywords = "Britain, Australia, micro‐economic reform, award restructuring, work organisation, flexibility, industrial relations, functional flexibility, numerical flexibility, consensual, adversarial, Japanese management, Workplace change",
author = "Bamber, {Greg J.}",
note = "Journal Published by Australian Human Resources Institute (AHRI)",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/103841119002800303",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "28--44",
journal = "Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources",
issn = "1038-4111",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Flexible Work Organisation : Inferences from Britain and Australia. / Bamber, Greg J.

In: Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 28, No. 3, 01.01.1990, p. 28-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flexible Work Organisation

T2 - Inferences from Britain and Australia

AU - Bamber, Greg J.

N1 - Journal Published by Australian Human Resources Institute (AHRI)

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - Against the background of much debate in Australia and New Zealand about micro‐economic reform and award restructuring, this article outlines several critical analyses of fragmented work organisation. From eight types of employment flexibility (summarised in an appendix), it focuses on job flexibility, and argues that employers in an adversarial (Type I) industrial relations context tend to have less job (functional) flexibility but more numerical flexibility than those in a more consensual (Type II) context. Yet there have been recent moves towards greater job flexibility in Australia, Britain and other English‐speaking countries, which can be characterised as having traditionally provided a predominantly adversarial context. Some such moves have been associated with Japanese influences and new styles of industrial awards and agreements. The article includes four propositions which may guide future research. It proposes longitudinal research on job flexibility, using an audit of work organisation. Such an audit could be of benefit to practitioners and to those seeking to explain changing forms of work organisation. 

AB - Against the background of much debate in Australia and New Zealand about micro‐economic reform and award restructuring, this article outlines several critical analyses of fragmented work organisation. From eight types of employment flexibility (summarised in an appendix), it focuses on job flexibility, and argues that employers in an adversarial (Type I) industrial relations context tend to have less job (functional) flexibility but more numerical flexibility than those in a more consensual (Type II) context. Yet there have been recent moves towards greater job flexibility in Australia, Britain and other English‐speaking countries, which can be characterised as having traditionally provided a predominantly adversarial context. Some such moves have been associated with Japanese influences and new styles of industrial awards and agreements. The article includes four propositions which may guide future research. It proposes longitudinal research on job flexibility, using an audit of work organisation. Such an audit could be of benefit to practitioners and to those seeking to explain changing forms of work organisation. 

KW - Britain

KW - Australia

KW - micro‐economic reform

KW - award restructuring

KW - work organisation

KW - flexibility

KW - industrial relations

KW - functional flexibility

KW - numerical flexibility

KW - consensual

KW - adversarial

KW - Japanese management

KW - Workplace change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977702647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/103841119002800303

DO - 10.1177/103841119002800303

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 28

EP - 44

JO - Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources

JF - Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources

SN - 1038-4111

IS - 3

ER -