Abstract
Recently, two generic watermarking protocols were proposed, based on a popular zero-knowledge identification protocol. In this paper, we show that both protocols are flawed and therefore fail to achieve their purpose of allowing a prover to prove to a verifier of his ownership of a watermarked image. We also give some suggestions to fix these flaws.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Third International Workshop on Digital Watermarking, IWDW 2004 |
Pages | 184-191 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Volume | 3304 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | International Workshop on Digital Watermarking 2004 - Seoul, Korea, South Duration: 30 Oct 2004 → 1 Nov 2004 Conference number: 3rd https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/b106346 (Proceedings) |
Publication series
Name | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
---|---|
ISSN (Print) | 0302-9743 |
Conference
Conference | International Workshop on Digital Watermarking 2004 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | IWDW 2004 |
Country/Territory | Korea, South |
City | Seoul |
Period | 30/10/04 → 1/11/04 |
Internet address |
|
Keywords
- Flaws
- Generic
- Identification
- Watermark detection protocol
- Zero knowledge proof