Five recipient vessels for metachronous chest wall reconstruction

Case report and literature review

Whitney T. Chow, Warren Matthew Rozen, Nakul Gamanlal Patel, Venkat V. Ramakrishnan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Selecting potential recipient vessel options for free flap anastomosis is an important consideration in microsurgical breast and chest wall reconstruction. In these settings, the most common comprise the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels, although alternative anastomotic sites have also been described. On occasion, consideration of these alternatives becomes a necessity. The use of five separate recipient vessels is highlighted in a unique case of recurrent locally advanced breast cancer requiring multiple complex reconstructions using free tissue transfer. A 56-year-old lady presented for delayed breast reconstruction one year after radical mastectomy for locally advanced lobular breast cancer. Despite wide resections, local chest-wall recurrence five times necessitated five microsurgical reconstructions, using separate recipient pedicles: internal mammary vessels, thoracodorsal vessels, serratus branch of thoracodorsal vessels, intercostal vessels and thoracoacromial vessels. All flaps survived completely, without donor or recipient complications. There has not been a subsequent recurrence at 6 months since last reconstruction. The purpose of this report is to present the first reported case of microsurgical chest wall reconstruction using five separate free flaps requiring anastomosis to multiple recipient vessels for anterior chest wall coverage, to present a literature-based and clinical review of the regional vascular anatomy of the anterior chest wall, and to present an operative approach algorithm. In such complex cases, this understanding can facilitate a streamlined approach to management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-70
Number of pages5
JournalMicrosurgery
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Cite this

Chow, Whitney T. ; Rozen, Warren Matthew ; Patel, Nakul Gamanlal ; Ramakrishnan, Venkat V. / Five recipient vessels for metachronous chest wall reconstruction : Case report and literature review. In: Microsurgery. 2017 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 66-70.
@article{22a7b5b182544629ba957aae05efe2da,
title = "Five recipient vessels for metachronous chest wall reconstruction: Case report and literature review",
abstract = "Selecting potential recipient vessel options for free flap anastomosis is an important consideration in microsurgical breast and chest wall reconstruction. In these settings, the most common comprise the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels, although alternative anastomotic sites have also been described. On occasion, consideration of these alternatives becomes a necessity. The use of five separate recipient vessels is highlighted in a unique case of recurrent locally advanced breast cancer requiring multiple complex reconstructions using free tissue transfer. A 56-year-old lady presented for delayed breast reconstruction one year after radical mastectomy for locally advanced lobular breast cancer. Despite wide resections, local chest-wall recurrence five times necessitated five microsurgical reconstructions, using separate recipient pedicles: internal mammary vessels, thoracodorsal vessels, serratus branch of thoracodorsal vessels, intercostal vessels and thoracoacromial vessels. All flaps survived completely, without donor or recipient complications. There has not been a subsequent recurrence at 6 months since last reconstruction. The purpose of this report is to present the first reported case of microsurgical chest wall reconstruction using five separate free flaps requiring anastomosis to multiple recipient vessels for anterior chest wall coverage, to present a literature-based and clinical review of the regional vascular anatomy of the anterior chest wall, and to present an operative approach algorithm. In such complex cases, this understanding can facilitate a streamlined approach to management.",
author = "Chow, {Whitney T.} and Rozen, {Warren Matthew} and Patel, {Nakul Gamanlal} and Ramakrishnan, {Venkat V.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/micr.22496",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "66--70",
journal = "Microsurgery",
issn = "0738-1085",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Five recipient vessels for metachronous chest wall reconstruction : Case report and literature review. / Chow, Whitney T.; Rozen, Warren Matthew; Patel, Nakul Gamanlal; Ramakrishnan, Venkat V.

In: Microsurgery, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.2017, p. 66-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Five recipient vessels for metachronous chest wall reconstruction

T2 - Case report and literature review

AU - Chow, Whitney T.

AU - Rozen, Warren Matthew

AU - Patel, Nakul Gamanlal

AU - Ramakrishnan, Venkat V.

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Selecting potential recipient vessel options for free flap anastomosis is an important consideration in microsurgical breast and chest wall reconstruction. In these settings, the most common comprise the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels, although alternative anastomotic sites have also been described. On occasion, consideration of these alternatives becomes a necessity. The use of five separate recipient vessels is highlighted in a unique case of recurrent locally advanced breast cancer requiring multiple complex reconstructions using free tissue transfer. A 56-year-old lady presented for delayed breast reconstruction one year after radical mastectomy for locally advanced lobular breast cancer. Despite wide resections, local chest-wall recurrence five times necessitated five microsurgical reconstructions, using separate recipient pedicles: internal mammary vessels, thoracodorsal vessels, serratus branch of thoracodorsal vessels, intercostal vessels and thoracoacromial vessels. All flaps survived completely, without donor or recipient complications. There has not been a subsequent recurrence at 6 months since last reconstruction. The purpose of this report is to present the first reported case of microsurgical chest wall reconstruction using five separate free flaps requiring anastomosis to multiple recipient vessels for anterior chest wall coverage, to present a literature-based and clinical review of the regional vascular anatomy of the anterior chest wall, and to present an operative approach algorithm. In such complex cases, this understanding can facilitate a streamlined approach to management.

AB - Selecting potential recipient vessel options for free flap anastomosis is an important consideration in microsurgical breast and chest wall reconstruction. In these settings, the most common comprise the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels, although alternative anastomotic sites have also been described. On occasion, consideration of these alternatives becomes a necessity. The use of five separate recipient vessels is highlighted in a unique case of recurrent locally advanced breast cancer requiring multiple complex reconstructions using free tissue transfer. A 56-year-old lady presented for delayed breast reconstruction one year after radical mastectomy for locally advanced lobular breast cancer. Despite wide resections, local chest-wall recurrence five times necessitated five microsurgical reconstructions, using separate recipient pedicles: internal mammary vessels, thoracodorsal vessels, serratus branch of thoracodorsal vessels, intercostal vessels and thoracoacromial vessels. All flaps survived completely, without donor or recipient complications. There has not been a subsequent recurrence at 6 months since last reconstruction. The purpose of this report is to present the first reported case of microsurgical chest wall reconstruction using five separate free flaps requiring anastomosis to multiple recipient vessels for anterior chest wall coverage, to present a literature-based and clinical review of the regional vascular anatomy of the anterior chest wall, and to present an operative approach algorithm. In such complex cases, this understanding can facilitate a streamlined approach to management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941584761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/micr.22496

DO - 10.1002/micr.22496

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 66

EP - 70

JO - Microsurgery

JF - Microsurgery

SN - 0738-1085

IS - 1

ER -