Fitness-to-practice concerns in rural undergraduate medical education: a qualitative study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Since July 2010, new reporting requirements have applied to registered Australian health practitioners who have a reasonable belief that a practitioner or student (of any registered discipline) is exhibiting notifiable conduct . A study of healthcare complaints reported that a small number of practitioners are over-represented in the majority of formal complaints brought against doctors. The impetus for conducting this research was a recognition that identifying and responding to particular behaviours early may prevent issues requiring mandatory reporting later on. As a first step, a better understanding of how fitness-to-practice (FTP) concerns are viewed was sought from stakeholders in a rural medical school. Methods: This qualitative project used purposive and snowballing sampling. Thirteen participants from an Australian rural medical school were interviewed for the study about FTP concerns. Seven were university staff, including clinical educators, program co-ordinators and academic faculty. Six were medical students in the middle of their final year. Their de-identified interview transcripts were independently coded into themes and emergent data categories were refined through comparative analysis between the authors. Data collection ceased after theoretical saturation was achieved. Results: Although students and faculty staff responded similarly in their recognition of FTP concerns, they varied in their assessment of their frequency, with students indicating that concerns were rare. Students and staff expressed reluctance to formally report students or colleagues with FTP concerns because of the complexity and uncertainty of medical practice. Both groups considered early recognition of problems and implementation of supportive mechanisms as important, but students generally did not want to contact the university about concerns for fear of stigmatisation. Conclusion: Education providers need to have clear processes for identi
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1 - 7
Number of pages7
JournalBMC Medical Education
Volume14
Issue number1 (Art. No.: 195)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

@article{70d4dd24b6f344909ed57f3d187ea8d6,
title = "Fitness-to-practice concerns in rural undergraduate medical education: a qualitative study",
abstract = "Background: Since July 2010, new reporting requirements have applied to registered Australian health practitioners who have a reasonable belief that a practitioner or student (of any registered discipline) is exhibiting notifiable conduct . A study of healthcare complaints reported that a small number of practitioners are over-represented in the majority of formal complaints brought against doctors. The impetus for conducting this research was a recognition that identifying and responding to particular behaviours early may prevent issues requiring mandatory reporting later on. As a first step, a better understanding of how fitness-to-practice (FTP) concerns are viewed was sought from stakeholders in a rural medical school. Methods: This qualitative project used purposive and snowballing sampling. Thirteen participants from an Australian rural medical school were interviewed for the study about FTP concerns. Seven were university staff, including clinical educators, program co-ordinators and academic faculty. Six were medical students in the middle of their final year. Their de-identified interview transcripts were independently coded into themes and emergent data categories were refined through comparative analysis between the authors. Data collection ceased after theoretical saturation was achieved. Results: Although students and faculty staff responded similarly in their recognition of FTP concerns, they varied in their assessment of their frequency, with students indicating that concerns were rare. Students and staff expressed reluctance to formally report students or colleagues with FTP concerns because of the complexity and uncertainty of medical practice. Both groups considered early recognition of problems and implementation of supportive mechanisms as important, but students generally did not want to contact the university about concerns for fear of stigmatisation. Conclusion: Education providers need to have clear processes for identi",
author = "Snow, {Pamela Claire} and Harvey, {Pamela Jane} and Kylie Cocking",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6920-14-195",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1 -- 7",
journal = "BMC Medical Education",
issn = "1472-6920",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "1 (Art. No.: 195)",

}

Fitness-to-practice concerns in rural undergraduate medical education: a qualitative study. / Snow, Pamela Claire; Harvey, Pamela Jane; Cocking, Kylie.

In: BMC Medical Education, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Art. No.: 195), 2014, p. 1 - 7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fitness-to-practice concerns in rural undergraduate medical education: a qualitative study

AU - Snow, Pamela Claire

AU - Harvey, Pamela Jane

AU - Cocking, Kylie

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Since July 2010, new reporting requirements have applied to registered Australian health practitioners who have a reasonable belief that a practitioner or student (of any registered discipline) is exhibiting notifiable conduct . A study of healthcare complaints reported that a small number of practitioners are over-represented in the majority of formal complaints brought against doctors. The impetus for conducting this research was a recognition that identifying and responding to particular behaviours early may prevent issues requiring mandatory reporting later on. As a first step, a better understanding of how fitness-to-practice (FTP) concerns are viewed was sought from stakeholders in a rural medical school. Methods: This qualitative project used purposive and snowballing sampling. Thirteen participants from an Australian rural medical school were interviewed for the study about FTP concerns. Seven were university staff, including clinical educators, program co-ordinators and academic faculty. Six were medical students in the middle of their final year. Their de-identified interview transcripts were independently coded into themes and emergent data categories were refined through comparative analysis between the authors. Data collection ceased after theoretical saturation was achieved. Results: Although students and faculty staff responded similarly in their recognition of FTP concerns, they varied in their assessment of their frequency, with students indicating that concerns were rare. Students and staff expressed reluctance to formally report students or colleagues with FTP concerns because of the complexity and uncertainty of medical practice. Both groups considered early recognition of problems and implementation of supportive mechanisms as important, but students generally did not want to contact the university about concerns for fear of stigmatisation. Conclusion: Education providers need to have clear processes for identi

AB - Background: Since July 2010, new reporting requirements have applied to registered Australian health practitioners who have a reasonable belief that a practitioner or student (of any registered discipline) is exhibiting notifiable conduct . A study of healthcare complaints reported that a small number of practitioners are over-represented in the majority of formal complaints brought against doctors. The impetus for conducting this research was a recognition that identifying and responding to particular behaviours early may prevent issues requiring mandatory reporting later on. As a first step, a better understanding of how fitness-to-practice (FTP) concerns are viewed was sought from stakeholders in a rural medical school. Methods: This qualitative project used purposive and snowballing sampling. Thirteen participants from an Australian rural medical school were interviewed for the study about FTP concerns. Seven were university staff, including clinical educators, program co-ordinators and academic faculty. Six were medical students in the middle of their final year. Their de-identified interview transcripts were independently coded into themes and emergent data categories were refined through comparative analysis between the authors. Data collection ceased after theoretical saturation was achieved. Results: Although students and faculty staff responded similarly in their recognition of FTP concerns, they varied in their assessment of their frequency, with students indicating that concerns were rare. Students and staff expressed reluctance to formally report students or colleagues with FTP concerns because of the complexity and uncertainty of medical practice. Both groups considered early recognition of problems and implementation of supportive mechanisms as important, but students generally did not want to contact the university about concerns for fear of stigmatisation. Conclusion: Education providers need to have clear processes for identi

UR - http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6920-14-195.pdf

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6920-14-195

DO - 10.1186/1472-6920-14-195

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - BMC Medical Education

JF - BMC Medical Education

SN - 1472-6920

IS - 1 (Art. No.: 195)

ER -