Findings from a multi-method study on test-driven development

Simone Romano, Davide Fucci, Giuseppe Scanniello, Burak Turhan, Natalia Juristo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context Test-driven development (TDD) is an iterative software development practice where unit tests are defined before production code. A number of quantitative empirical investigations have been conducted about this practice. The results are contrasting and inconclusive. In addition, previous studies fail to analyze the values, beliefs, and assumptions that inform and shape TDD.
Objective We present a study designed, and conducted to understand the values, beliefs, and assumptions about TDD. Participants were novice and professional software developers.
Method We conducted an ethnographically-informed study with 14 novice software developers, i.e., graduate students in Computer Science at the University of Basilicata, and six professional software developers (with one to 10 years work experience). The participants worked on the implementation of a new feature for an existing software written in Java. We immersed ourselves in the context of our study. We collected qualitative information by means of audio recordings, contemporaneous field notes, and other kinds of artifacts. We collected quantitative data from the integrated development environment to support or refute the ethnography results.
Results The main insights of our study can be summarized as follows: (i) refactoring (one of the phases of TDD) is not performed as often as the process requires and it is considered less important than other phases, (ii) the most important phase is implementation, (iii) unit tests are almost never up-to-date, and (iv) participants first build in their mind a sort of model of the source code to be implemented and only then write test cases. The analysis of the quantitative data supported the following qualitative findings: (i), (iii), and (iv). Conclusions Developers write quick-and-dirty production code to pass the tests, do not update their tests often, and ignore refactoring.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-77
Number of pages14
JournalInformation and Software Technology
Volume89
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ethnographically-informed study
  • Qualitative study
  • Test driven development

Cite this