Abstract
While auditing practices for public officials existed in all the Italian peninsula during the communal era, they had nowhere as prominent a place, or better surviving records, as in the Italian city-states. In this chapter, the author shows that the regulation of sindacato, an end-of-term audit for urban officials, was of a kind with normative and literary discourses about accountability, good government and the common good, but argues that these cannot be seen in isolation from documentary evidence. Based on a detailed analysis of the rich judicial and administrative records from fourteenth-century Perugia, this chapter shows that the connection between accountability of office and political legitimacy implicit in the sindacato is less straightforward than commonly thought. Rather than a marker of transparent, participatory politics, the sindacato was a complex, inherently biased, often slow and ineffectual mechanism, which could conceal as much as it revealed about the administration of the city.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Anti-Corruption in History |
| Subtitle of host publication | From Antiquity to the Modern Era |
| Editors | Ronald Kroeze, André Vitória, Guy Geltner |
| Place of Publication | Oxford UK |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Chapter | 7 |
| Pages | 103-121 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780198809975 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Accountability
- Anticorruption
- Corruption
- Fourteenth century
- Italy
- Perugia
- Podestà
- Sindacato