Fidgeting as self-evidencing

A predictive processing account of non-goal-directed action

Kelsey Perrykkad, Jakob Hohwy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Non-goal-directed actions have been relatively neglected in cognitive science, but are ubiquitous and related to important cognitive functions. Fidgeting is seemingly one subtype of non-goal-directed action which is ripe for a functional account. What's the point of fidgeting? The predictive processing framework is a parsimonious account of brain function which says the brain aims to minimise the difference between expected and actual states of the world and itself, that is, minimise prediction error. This framework situates action selection in terms of active inference for expected states. However, seemingly aimless, idle actions, such as fidgeting, are a challenge to such theories. When our actions are not obviously goal-achieving, how can a predictive processing framework explain why we regularly do them anyway? Here, we argue that in a predictive processing framework, evidence for the agent's own existence is consolidated by self-stimulation or fidgeting. Endogenous, repetitive actions reduce uncertainty about the system's own states, and thus help continuously maintain expected rates of prediction error minimisation. We extend this explanation to clinically distinctive self-stimulation, such as in Autism Spectrum Conditions, in which effective strategies for self-evidencing may be different to the neurotypical case.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100750
Number of pages8
JournalNew Ideas in Psychology
Volume56
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Autism spectrum conditions
  • Fidgeting
  • Non-goal-directed action
  • Prediction error minimisation
  • Self-evidencing

Cite this

@article{1adc09ddd1f44f0faa71b699a6283f3e,
title = "Fidgeting as self-evidencing: A predictive processing account of non-goal-directed action",
abstract = "Non-goal-directed actions have been relatively neglected in cognitive science, but are ubiquitous and related to important cognitive functions. Fidgeting is seemingly one subtype of non-goal-directed action which is ripe for a functional account. What's the point of fidgeting? The predictive processing framework is a parsimonious account of brain function which says the brain aims to minimise the difference between expected and actual states of the world and itself, that is, minimise prediction error. This framework situates action selection in terms of active inference for expected states. However, seemingly aimless, idle actions, such as fidgeting, are a challenge to such theories. When our actions are not obviously goal-achieving, how can a predictive processing framework explain why we regularly do them anyway? Here, we argue that in a predictive processing framework, evidence for the agent's own existence is consolidated by self-stimulation or fidgeting. Endogenous, repetitive actions reduce uncertainty about the system's own states, and thus help continuously maintain expected rates of prediction error minimisation. We extend this explanation to clinically distinctive self-stimulation, such as in Autism Spectrum Conditions, in which effective strategies for self-evidencing may be different to the neurotypical case.",
keywords = "Autism spectrum conditions, Fidgeting, Non-goal-directed action, Prediction error minimisation, Self-evidencing",
author = "Kelsey Perrykkad and Jakob Hohwy",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100750",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
journal = "New Ideas in Psychology",
issn = "0732-118X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Fidgeting as self-evidencing : A predictive processing account of non-goal-directed action. / Perrykkad, Kelsey; Hohwy, Jakob.

In: New Ideas in Psychology, Vol. 56, 100750, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fidgeting as self-evidencing

T2 - A predictive processing account of non-goal-directed action

AU - Perrykkad, Kelsey

AU - Hohwy, Jakob

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Non-goal-directed actions have been relatively neglected in cognitive science, but are ubiquitous and related to important cognitive functions. Fidgeting is seemingly one subtype of non-goal-directed action which is ripe for a functional account. What's the point of fidgeting? The predictive processing framework is a parsimonious account of brain function which says the brain aims to minimise the difference between expected and actual states of the world and itself, that is, minimise prediction error. This framework situates action selection in terms of active inference for expected states. However, seemingly aimless, idle actions, such as fidgeting, are a challenge to such theories. When our actions are not obviously goal-achieving, how can a predictive processing framework explain why we regularly do them anyway? Here, we argue that in a predictive processing framework, evidence for the agent's own existence is consolidated by self-stimulation or fidgeting. Endogenous, repetitive actions reduce uncertainty about the system's own states, and thus help continuously maintain expected rates of prediction error minimisation. We extend this explanation to clinically distinctive self-stimulation, such as in Autism Spectrum Conditions, in which effective strategies for self-evidencing may be different to the neurotypical case.

AB - Non-goal-directed actions have been relatively neglected in cognitive science, but are ubiquitous and related to important cognitive functions. Fidgeting is seemingly one subtype of non-goal-directed action which is ripe for a functional account. What's the point of fidgeting? The predictive processing framework is a parsimonious account of brain function which says the brain aims to minimise the difference between expected and actual states of the world and itself, that is, minimise prediction error. This framework situates action selection in terms of active inference for expected states. However, seemingly aimless, idle actions, such as fidgeting, are a challenge to such theories. When our actions are not obviously goal-achieving, how can a predictive processing framework explain why we regularly do them anyway? Here, we argue that in a predictive processing framework, evidence for the agent's own existence is consolidated by self-stimulation or fidgeting. Endogenous, repetitive actions reduce uncertainty about the system's own states, and thus help continuously maintain expected rates of prediction error minimisation. We extend this explanation to clinically distinctive self-stimulation, such as in Autism Spectrum Conditions, in which effective strategies for self-evidencing may be different to the neurotypical case.

KW - Autism spectrum conditions

KW - Fidgeting

KW - Non-goal-directed action

KW - Prediction error minimisation

KW - Self-evidencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070276985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100750

DO - 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100750

M3 - Article

VL - 56

JO - New Ideas in Psychology

JF - New Ideas in Psychology

SN - 0732-118X

M1 - 100750

ER -