Abstract
Medical interventions should ideally only be offered if we know that they help the patient in improving outcome by reducing morbidity and mortality. At present, there is consensus that their effectiveness should be evaluated before incorporation into guidelines.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Fetal Therapy |
| Subtitle of host publication | Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits |
| Editors | Mark D. Kilby, Anthony Johnson, Dick Oepkes |
| Place of Publication | United Kingdom |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Chapter | 53 |
| Pages | 561-569 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Edition | 2nd |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781108564434 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781108474061 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Research output
- 1 Chapter (Book)
-
The future: Fetal therapy and translational studies: Global alignment, coordination, and collaboration in perinatal research: The global obstetrics network (GONet) initiative
on behalf of the GONet collaborators, 1 Jan 2009, Fetal Therapy: Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits. Kilby , M. D., Oepkes, D. & Johnson , A. (eds.). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, p. 433-439 7 p.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (Book) › Research › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver