Feedback, task performance, and interface preferences

Steven Bellman, Kyle B Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Interface preferences are influenced by switching costs, including cognitive switching costs of thinking and task performance. In this research, we use feedback intervention theory to predict that feedback can have psychological effects that override the lock-in effect of cognitive switching costs on interface preference. To demonstrate this effect, we use normative feedback, which compares a user’s task performance to the performance of others. This focuses attention on the user’s self-concept and away from task performance. We use a hedonic information systems (IS) interface – an online game – as feedback valence should have a stronger effect on preferences for hedonic IS as opposed to utilitarian IS. Hedonic IS are preferred for their enjoyment value, as well as their productivity, and positive feedback should be more enjoyable than negative feedback. Results from an online experiment that manipulated the presence of feedback and feedback valence, for a sample of 482 users, support our hypotheses. The theoretical and managerial implications of these results are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)654-669
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of Information Systems
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cognitive lock-in
  • feedback intervention theory
  • human capital model
  • Interface
  • power law of practice
  • preference

Cite this

@article{fd24bda0d40f44d7abc4d51cbf2f70e5,
title = "Feedback, task performance, and interface preferences",
abstract = "Interface preferences are influenced by switching costs, including cognitive switching costs of thinking and task performance. In this research, we use feedback intervention theory to predict that feedback can have psychological effects that override the lock-in effect of cognitive switching costs on interface preference. To demonstrate this effect, we use normative feedback, which compares a user’s task performance to the performance of others. This focuses attention on the user’s self-concept and away from task performance. We use a hedonic information systems (IS) interface – an online game – as feedback valence should have a stronger effect on preferences for hedonic IS as opposed to utilitarian IS. Hedonic IS are preferred for their enjoyment value, as well as their productivity, and positive feedback should be more enjoyable than negative feedback. Results from an online experiment that manipulated the presence of feedback and feedback valence, for a sample of 482 users, support our hypotheses. The theoretical and managerial implications of these results are discussed.",
keywords = "cognitive lock-in, feedback intervention theory, human capital model, Interface, power law of practice, preference",
author = "Steven Bellman and Murray, {Kyle B}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/0960085X.2018.1475876",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "654--669",
journal = "European Journal of Information Systems",
issn = "0960-085X",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
number = "6",

}

Feedback, task performance, and interface preferences. / Bellman, Steven; Murray, Kyle B.

In: European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 27, No. 6, 02.11.2018, p. 654-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feedback, task performance, and interface preferences

AU - Bellman, Steven

AU - Murray, Kyle B

PY - 2018/11/2

Y1 - 2018/11/2

N2 - Interface preferences are influenced by switching costs, including cognitive switching costs of thinking and task performance. In this research, we use feedback intervention theory to predict that feedback can have psychological effects that override the lock-in effect of cognitive switching costs on interface preference. To demonstrate this effect, we use normative feedback, which compares a user’s task performance to the performance of others. This focuses attention on the user’s self-concept and away from task performance. We use a hedonic information systems (IS) interface – an online game – as feedback valence should have a stronger effect on preferences for hedonic IS as opposed to utilitarian IS. Hedonic IS are preferred for their enjoyment value, as well as their productivity, and positive feedback should be more enjoyable than negative feedback. Results from an online experiment that manipulated the presence of feedback and feedback valence, for a sample of 482 users, support our hypotheses. The theoretical and managerial implications of these results are discussed.

AB - Interface preferences are influenced by switching costs, including cognitive switching costs of thinking and task performance. In this research, we use feedback intervention theory to predict that feedback can have psychological effects that override the lock-in effect of cognitive switching costs on interface preference. To demonstrate this effect, we use normative feedback, which compares a user’s task performance to the performance of others. This focuses attention on the user’s self-concept and away from task performance. We use a hedonic information systems (IS) interface – an online game – as feedback valence should have a stronger effect on preferences for hedonic IS as opposed to utilitarian IS. Hedonic IS are preferred for their enjoyment value, as well as their productivity, and positive feedback should be more enjoyable than negative feedback. Results from an online experiment that manipulated the presence of feedback and feedback valence, for a sample of 482 users, support our hypotheses. The theoretical and managerial implications of these results are discussed.

KW - cognitive lock-in

KW - feedback intervention theory

KW - human capital model

KW - Interface

KW - power law of practice

KW - preference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047259159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0960085X.2018.1475876

DO - 10.1080/0960085X.2018.1475876

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 654

EP - 669

JO - European Journal of Information Systems

JF - European Journal of Information Systems

SN - 0960-085X

IS - 6

ER -