Feasibility of a health-utility approach to quantifying noneconomic losses from personal injury

Natalie Carvalho, David Fish, Genevieve M. Grant, Joshua A. Salomon, David M. Studdert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

There is wide agreement that existing approaches to valuing noneconomic losses from personal injury lack coherence. “Health-utility” measurement—an approach developed in health economics for valuing health outcomes in public health and medicine—holds considerable promise for bringing greater rationality and consistency to assessments of injury-related noneconomic loss. However, the feasibility of creating utility measures that are suitable for use in personal injury compensation has not been demonstrated. This study takes that step. We surveyed more than 4,100 members of the general public in Australia to assess people's preferences for a variety of nonfatal “health states.” The health states were selected to reflect harms commonly seen in claims to compensation schemes for transport and workplace accidents. We then followed established methods for transforming the survey responses into a “severity weight” for each health state. We show how these severity weights can be used to define tiers in a schedule for guiding noneconomic damages determinations. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of the approach, and consider implementation challenges.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-319
Number of pages42
JournalJournal of Empirical Legal Studies
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Keywords

  • Injury compensation systems
  • Damages
  • Tort law
  • Non-economic loss

Cite this

@article{15319e0e50804f718ff96dbe7bb218db,
title = "Feasibility of a health-utility approach to quantifying noneconomic losses from personal injury",
abstract = "There is wide agreement that existing approaches to valuing noneconomic losses from personal injury lack coherence. “Health-utility” measurement—an approach developed in health economics for valuing health outcomes in public health and medicine—holds considerable promise for bringing greater rationality and consistency to assessments of injury-related noneconomic loss. However, the feasibility of creating utility measures that are suitable for use in personal injury compensation has not been demonstrated. This study takes that step. We surveyed more than 4,100 members of the general public in Australia to assess people's preferences for a variety of nonfatal “health states.” The health states were selected to reflect harms commonly seen in claims to compensation schemes for transport and workplace accidents. We then followed established methods for transforming the survey responses into a “severity weight” for each health state. We show how these severity weights can be used to define tiers in a schedule for guiding noneconomic damages determinations. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of the approach, and consider implementation challenges.",
keywords = "Injury compensation systems, Damages, Tort law, Non-economic loss",
author = "Natalie Carvalho and David Fish and Grant, {Genevieve M.} and Salomon, {Joshua A.} and Studdert, {David M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jels.12179",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "278--319",
journal = "Journal of Empirical Legal Studies",
issn = "1740-1453",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Feasibility of a health-utility approach to quantifying noneconomic losses from personal injury. / Carvalho, Natalie; Fish, David; Grant, Genevieve M.; Salomon, Joshua A.; Studdert, David M.

In: Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 278-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of a health-utility approach to quantifying noneconomic losses from personal injury

AU - Carvalho, Natalie

AU - Fish, David

AU - Grant, Genevieve M.

AU - Salomon, Joshua A.

AU - Studdert, David M.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - There is wide agreement that existing approaches to valuing noneconomic losses from personal injury lack coherence. “Health-utility” measurement—an approach developed in health economics for valuing health outcomes in public health and medicine—holds considerable promise for bringing greater rationality and consistency to assessments of injury-related noneconomic loss. However, the feasibility of creating utility measures that are suitable for use in personal injury compensation has not been demonstrated. This study takes that step. We surveyed more than 4,100 members of the general public in Australia to assess people's preferences for a variety of nonfatal “health states.” The health states were selected to reflect harms commonly seen in claims to compensation schemes for transport and workplace accidents. We then followed established methods for transforming the survey responses into a “severity weight” for each health state. We show how these severity weights can be used to define tiers in a schedule for guiding noneconomic damages determinations. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of the approach, and consider implementation challenges.

AB - There is wide agreement that existing approaches to valuing noneconomic losses from personal injury lack coherence. “Health-utility” measurement—an approach developed in health economics for valuing health outcomes in public health and medicine—holds considerable promise for bringing greater rationality and consistency to assessments of injury-related noneconomic loss. However, the feasibility of creating utility measures that are suitable for use in personal injury compensation has not been demonstrated. This study takes that step. We surveyed more than 4,100 members of the general public in Australia to assess people's preferences for a variety of nonfatal “health states.” The health states were selected to reflect harms commonly seen in claims to compensation schemes for transport and workplace accidents. We then followed established methods for transforming the survey responses into a “severity weight” for each health state. We show how these severity weights can be used to define tiers in a schedule for guiding noneconomic damages determinations. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of the approach, and consider implementation challenges.

KW - Injury compensation systems

KW - Damages

KW - Tort law

KW - Non-economic loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044932023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jels.12179

DO - 10.1111/jels.12179

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 278

EP - 319

JO - Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

JF - Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

SN - 1740-1453

IS - 2

ER -