Fear-Mongering or Fact-Driven? Illuminating the Interplay of Objective Risk and Emotion-Evoking Form in the Response to Epidemic News

Celine Klemm, Tilo Hartmann, Enny Das

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This study examined the veracity of the common assumption that news coverage of epidemic outbreaks spawns heightened fears and risk perceptions. An online experiment with 1,324 participants investigated the interplay of the form of news coverage (factual/emotion-laden) and key aspects of actual risk (low/high vulnerability, low/high severity) on audience responses. Participants read one of eight versions of a newspaper article followed by measures on risk perceptions, negative affect, behavioral intentions, and perceived sensationalism. Risk perceptions and fear were primarily driven by objective risk characteristics, whereas emotion-laden news form only increased perceptions of disease severity, not of fear or personal vulnerability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-83
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Communication
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{24de43635f004c40b200d0191dc8fbc4,
title = "Fear-Mongering or Fact-Driven? Illuminating the Interplay of Objective Risk and Emotion-Evoking Form in the Response to Epidemic News",
abstract = "This study examined the veracity of the common assumption that news coverage of epidemic outbreaks spawns heightened fears and risk perceptions. An online experiment with 1,324 participants investigated the interplay of the form of news coverage (factual/emotion-laden) and key aspects of actual risk (low/high vulnerability, low/high severity) on audience responses. Participants read one of eight versions of a newspaper article followed by measures on risk perceptions, negative affect, behavioral intentions, and perceived sensationalism. Risk perceptions and fear were primarily driven by objective risk characteristics, whereas emotion-laden news form only increased perceptions of disease severity, not of fear or personal vulnerability.",
author = "Celine Klemm and Tilo Hartmann and Enny Das",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10410236.2017.1384429",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "74--83",
journal = "Health Communication",
issn = "1041-0236",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Fear-Mongering or Fact-Driven? Illuminating the Interplay of Objective Risk and Emotion-Evoking Form in the Response to Epidemic News. / Klemm, Celine; Hartmann, Tilo; Das, Enny.

In: Health Communication, Vol. 34, No. 1, 02.01.2019, p. 74-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fear-Mongering or Fact-Driven? Illuminating the Interplay of Objective Risk and Emotion-Evoking Form in the Response to Epidemic News

AU - Klemm, Celine

AU - Hartmann, Tilo

AU - Das, Enny

PY - 2019/1/2

Y1 - 2019/1/2

N2 - This study examined the veracity of the common assumption that news coverage of epidemic outbreaks spawns heightened fears and risk perceptions. An online experiment with 1,324 participants investigated the interplay of the form of news coverage (factual/emotion-laden) and key aspects of actual risk (low/high vulnerability, low/high severity) on audience responses. Participants read one of eight versions of a newspaper article followed by measures on risk perceptions, negative affect, behavioral intentions, and perceived sensationalism. Risk perceptions and fear were primarily driven by objective risk characteristics, whereas emotion-laden news form only increased perceptions of disease severity, not of fear or personal vulnerability.

AB - This study examined the veracity of the common assumption that news coverage of epidemic outbreaks spawns heightened fears and risk perceptions. An online experiment with 1,324 participants investigated the interplay of the form of news coverage (factual/emotion-laden) and key aspects of actual risk (low/high vulnerability, low/high severity) on audience responses. Participants read one of eight versions of a newspaper article followed by measures on risk perceptions, negative affect, behavioral intentions, and perceived sensationalism. Risk perceptions and fear were primarily driven by objective risk characteristics, whereas emotion-laden news form only increased perceptions of disease severity, not of fear or personal vulnerability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031933319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10410236.2017.1384429

DO - 10.1080/10410236.2017.1384429

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 74

EP - 83

JO - Health Communication

JF - Health Communication

SN - 1041-0236

IS - 1

ER -