Eye tracking reveals processes that enable conjoint choices to become increasingly efficient with practice

Martin Meissner, Andres Musalem, Joel C Huber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Choice-based conjoint is a popular technique for characterizing consumers' choices. Three eye-tracking studies explore decision processes in conjoint choices that take less time and become more accurate with practice. These studies reveal two simplification processes that are associated with greater speed and reliability. Alternative focus gradually shifts attention toward options that represent promising choices, whereas attribute focus directs attention to important attributes that are most likely to alter or confirm a decision. Alternative and attribute focus increase in intensity with practice. In terms of biases, the authors detect a small but consistent focus on positive aspects of the item chosen and negative aspects of the items not chosen. They also show that incidental exposures arising from the first-examined alternative or from alternatives in a central horizontal location increase attention but have a much more modest and often insignificant impact on conjoint choices. Overall, conjoint choice is found to be a process that is (1) largely formed by goal-driven values that respondents bring to the task and (2) relatively free of distorting effects from task layout or random exposures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1 - 17
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Marketing Research
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this

Meissner, Martin ; Musalem, Andres ; Huber, Joel C. / Eye tracking reveals processes that enable conjoint choices to become increasingly efficient with practice. In: Journal of Marketing Research. 2016 ; Vol. 53, No. 1. pp. 1 - 17.
@article{a69ea61c374143e995ee1b99b0bf5111,
title = "Eye tracking reveals processes that enable conjoint choices to become increasingly efficient with practice",
abstract = "Choice-based conjoint is a popular technique for characterizing consumers' choices. Three eye-tracking studies explore decision processes in conjoint choices that take less time and become more accurate with practice. These studies reveal two simplification processes that are associated with greater speed and reliability. Alternative focus gradually shifts attention toward options that represent promising choices, whereas attribute focus directs attention to important attributes that are most likely to alter or confirm a decision. Alternative and attribute focus increase in intensity with practice. In terms of biases, the authors detect a small but consistent focus on positive aspects of the item chosen and negative aspects of the items not chosen. They also show that incidental exposures arising from the first-examined alternative or from alternatives in a central horizontal location increase attention but have a much more modest and often insignificant impact on conjoint choices. Overall, conjoint choice is found to be a process that is (1) largely formed by goal-driven values that respondents bring to the task and (2) relatively free of distorting effects from task layout or random exposures.",
author = "Martin Meissner and Andres Musalem and Huber, {Joel C}",
note = "nonValidatingUrl:javascript:__doPostBack('ctl00$ctl00$Column1$Column1$formatButtonsTop$formatButtonRepeater$ctl02$linkButton','')",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1509/jmr.13.0467",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "1 -- 17",
journal = "Journal of Marketing Research",
issn = "0022-2437",
publisher = "American Marketing Association",
number = "1",

}

Eye tracking reveals processes that enable conjoint choices to become increasingly efficient with practice. / Meissner, Martin; Musalem, Andres; Huber, Joel C.

In: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2016, p. 1 - 17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eye tracking reveals processes that enable conjoint choices to become increasingly efficient with practice

AU - Meissner, Martin

AU - Musalem, Andres

AU - Huber, Joel C

N1 - nonValidatingUrl:javascript:__doPostBack('ctl00$ctl00$Column1$Column1$formatButtonsTop$formatButtonRepeater$ctl02$linkButton','')

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Choice-based conjoint is a popular technique for characterizing consumers' choices. Three eye-tracking studies explore decision processes in conjoint choices that take less time and become more accurate with practice. These studies reveal two simplification processes that are associated with greater speed and reliability. Alternative focus gradually shifts attention toward options that represent promising choices, whereas attribute focus directs attention to important attributes that are most likely to alter or confirm a decision. Alternative and attribute focus increase in intensity with practice. In terms of biases, the authors detect a small but consistent focus on positive aspects of the item chosen and negative aspects of the items not chosen. They also show that incidental exposures arising from the first-examined alternative or from alternatives in a central horizontal location increase attention but have a much more modest and often insignificant impact on conjoint choices. Overall, conjoint choice is found to be a process that is (1) largely formed by goal-driven values that respondents bring to the task and (2) relatively free of distorting effects from task layout or random exposures.

AB - Choice-based conjoint is a popular technique for characterizing consumers' choices. Three eye-tracking studies explore decision processes in conjoint choices that take less time and become more accurate with practice. These studies reveal two simplification processes that are associated with greater speed and reliability. Alternative focus gradually shifts attention toward options that represent promising choices, whereas attribute focus directs attention to important attributes that are most likely to alter or confirm a decision. Alternative and attribute focus increase in intensity with practice. In terms of biases, the authors detect a small but consistent focus on positive aspects of the item chosen and negative aspects of the items not chosen. They also show that incidental exposures arising from the first-examined alternative or from alternatives in a central horizontal location increase attention but have a much more modest and often insignificant impact on conjoint choices. Overall, conjoint choice is found to be a process that is (1) largely formed by goal-driven values that respondents bring to the task and (2) relatively free of distorting effects from task layout or random exposures.

U2 - 10.1509/jmr.13.0467

DO - 10.1509/jmr.13.0467

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Journal of Marketing Research

JF - Journal of Marketing Research

SN - 0022-2437

IS - 1

ER -