Exploring what the Austin Maze measures: a comparison across conventional and computer versions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Austin Maze is a neuropsychological assessment tool used to measure cognitive function. A computerised version of the tool has recently been developed and shown to be equivalent to the conventional version in terms of performance. However, controversy remains regarding which specific cognitive constructs the conventional and computer versions of the Austin Maze purport to measure. The aim of this study was to investigate which cognitive constructs are associated with Austin Maze performance and whether these constructs remain equivalent across conventional and computer versions. Sixty-three healthy people completed both conventional and computerised versions of the Austin Maze in addition to a number of established measures of planning, error utilisation, working memory, visuospatial ability and visuospatial memory. Results from a series of regression analyses demonstrated that both versions of the Austin Maze were predominantly associated with visuospatial ability and visuospatial memory. No executive measures, including those of planning, error utilisation or working memory, significantly contributed to any Austin Maze performances. This study complements previous research and supports equivalency of the conventional and computer versions of the Austin Maze.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243 - 252
Number of pages10
JournalBrain Impairment
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this

@article{bb61ed4e40d147bdbdac6bd8a867f552,
title = "Exploring what the Austin Maze measures: a comparison across conventional and computer versions",
abstract = "The Austin Maze is a neuropsychological assessment tool used to measure cognitive function. A computerised version of the tool has recently been developed and shown to be equivalent to the conventional version in terms of performance. However, controversy remains regarding which specific cognitive constructs the conventional and computer versions of the Austin Maze purport to measure. The aim of this study was to investigate which cognitive constructs are associated with Austin Maze performance and whether these constructs remain equivalent across conventional and computer versions. Sixty-three healthy people completed both conventional and computerised versions of the Austin Maze in addition to a number of established measures of planning, error utilisation, working memory, visuospatial ability and visuospatial memory. Results from a series of regression analyses demonstrated that both versions of the Austin Maze were predominantly associated with visuospatial ability and visuospatial memory. No executive measures, including those of planning, error utilisation or working memory, significantly contributed to any Austin Maze performances. This study complements previous research and supports equivalency of the conventional and computer versions of the Austin Maze.",
author = "Renerus-John Stolwyk and Shuzi Lee and McKay, {Adam John Davy} and Ponsford, {Jennie Louise}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1017/BrImp.2013.23",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "243 -- 252",
journal = "Brain Impairment",
issn = "1443-9646",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Exploring what the Austin Maze measures: a comparison across conventional and computer versions. / Stolwyk, Renerus-John; Lee, Shuzi; McKay, Adam John Davy; Ponsford, Jennie Louise.

In: Brain Impairment, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2013, p. 243 - 252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring what the Austin Maze measures: a comparison across conventional and computer versions

AU - Stolwyk, Renerus-John

AU - Lee, Shuzi

AU - McKay, Adam John Davy

AU - Ponsford, Jennie Louise

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The Austin Maze is a neuropsychological assessment tool used to measure cognitive function. A computerised version of the tool has recently been developed and shown to be equivalent to the conventional version in terms of performance. However, controversy remains regarding which specific cognitive constructs the conventional and computer versions of the Austin Maze purport to measure. The aim of this study was to investigate which cognitive constructs are associated with Austin Maze performance and whether these constructs remain equivalent across conventional and computer versions. Sixty-three healthy people completed both conventional and computerised versions of the Austin Maze in addition to a number of established measures of planning, error utilisation, working memory, visuospatial ability and visuospatial memory. Results from a series of regression analyses demonstrated that both versions of the Austin Maze were predominantly associated with visuospatial ability and visuospatial memory. No executive measures, including those of planning, error utilisation or working memory, significantly contributed to any Austin Maze performances. This study complements previous research and supports equivalency of the conventional and computer versions of the Austin Maze.

AB - The Austin Maze is a neuropsychological assessment tool used to measure cognitive function. A computerised version of the tool has recently been developed and shown to be equivalent to the conventional version in terms of performance. However, controversy remains regarding which specific cognitive constructs the conventional and computer versions of the Austin Maze purport to measure. The aim of this study was to investigate which cognitive constructs are associated with Austin Maze performance and whether these constructs remain equivalent across conventional and computer versions. Sixty-three healthy people completed both conventional and computerised versions of the Austin Maze in addition to a number of established measures of planning, error utilisation, working memory, visuospatial ability and visuospatial memory. Results from a series of regression analyses demonstrated that both versions of the Austin Maze were predominantly associated with visuospatial ability and visuospatial memory. No executive measures, including those of planning, error utilisation or working memory, significantly contributed to any Austin Maze performances. This study complements previous research and supports equivalency of the conventional and computer versions of the Austin Maze.

UR - http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FBIM%2FBIM14_02%2FS1443964613000235a.pdf&code=cd9989945072d9149a5cdd4ecca8b84c

U2 - 10.1017/BrImp.2013.23

DO - 10.1017/BrImp.2013.23

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 243

EP - 252

JO - Brain Impairment

JF - Brain Impairment

SN - 1443-9646

IS - 2

ER -