Exploring performance outcomes and regulatory contexts of light rail in Australia and the US

Graham Currie, Christopher Luke De Gruyter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)


This paper explores the contemporary performance of Light Rail services in Australia and contrasts these with Light Rail in the USA in terms of scale of operations, ridership and service effectiveness. It explores these issues within the context of the regulatory structures which govern performance. The services explored have contrasting regulatory structures ranging from public operations to private sector operation using a range of forms of performance based contracting and competitive tendering. The study identifies that, in general, operations of all systems have grown as has ridership however significant reductions in service effectiveness (ridership per vkm) have occurred in US contexts where public sector operations have dominated. The implication is increases in public subsidies per trip. In Australia, Sydney and Melbourne Light Rail (private competitively tendered and performance based contracts) have consistently maintained and improved service effectiveness while in Adelaide, a public sector operation, service effectiveness has declined. The paper explores the policy implications of these findings and also considers more recent developments in packaging of private sector contracts for building new Light Rail systems in the Gold Coast and Sydney.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-303
Number of pages7
JournalResearch in Transportation Economics
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016


  • Light rail
  • Performance contracts
  • Contracting models
  • Performance measures

Cite this