Exploring Decision Pathways in Challenging Airway Management Episodes

Raphaela Schnittker, Stuart Marshall, Timothy Horberry, Kristie Young, Gavan Lintern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Anesthesia takes place in a complex, high-stakes environment where humans and technologies interact to provide medical care to patients. Providing adequate decision support for individuals and teams in anesthesia emergencies is important because emergencies are infrequent and complex. Current designs of decision support in airway management are not context specific and lack a consideration of how decisions are made under time pressure. To fill this gap, this study used frameworks from cognitive systems engineering to explore decisions of experienced anesthesia providers. The goal was to identify the decision pathways used in challenging airway management situations. The critical decision method was employed to interview anesthesia providers about a challenging incident they had experienced. Results illustrated that decisions were based on prior experience and made through a process of recognition. The vast majority of decisions were recognition primed, characterized by a direct link between cue familiarity and action generation. A few decisions involved concurrent option comparison, which was still based on situation recognition. Different cues received through teamwork, technologies, and patients contributed to the decisions. As different cognitive pathways may require different design solutions, the findings of this study are being used to help develop decision support tools in anesthesia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-370
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • cognitive systems engineering
  • cognitive task analysis
  • domains
  • health care delivery
  • methods
  • recognition-primed decision making
  • topics

Cite this

@article{657c11f493464fa2901d9fe877fb449b,
title = "Exploring Decision Pathways in Challenging Airway Management Episodes",
abstract = "Anesthesia takes place in a complex, high-stakes environment where humans and technologies interact to provide medical care to patients. Providing adequate decision support for individuals and teams in anesthesia emergencies is important because emergencies are infrequent and complex. Current designs of decision support in airway management are not context specific and lack a consideration of how decisions are made under time pressure. To fill this gap, this study used frameworks from cognitive systems engineering to explore decisions of experienced anesthesia providers. The goal was to identify the decision pathways used in challenging airway management situations. The critical decision method was employed to interview anesthesia providers about a challenging incident they had experienced. Results illustrated that decisions were based on prior experience and made through a process of recognition. The vast majority of decisions were recognition primed, characterized by a direct link between cue familiarity and action generation. A few decisions involved concurrent option comparison, which was still based on situation recognition. Different cues received through teamwork, technologies, and patients contributed to the decisions. As different cognitive pathways may require different design solutions, the findings of this study are being used to help develop decision support tools in anesthesia.",
keywords = "cognitive systems engineering, cognitive task analysis, domains, health care delivery, methods, recognition-primed decision making, topics",
author = "Raphaela Schnittker and Stuart Marshall and Timothy Horberry and Kristie Young and Gavan Lintern",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1555343417716843",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "353--370",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making",
issn = "1555-3434",
publisher = "Human Factors and Ergonomics Society",
number = "4",

}

Exploring Decision Pathways in Challenging Airway Management Episodes. / Schnittker, Raphaela; Marshall, Stuart ; Horberry, Timothy ; Young, Kristie ; Lintern, Gavan .

In: Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, Vol. 11, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 353-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring Decision Pathways in Challenging Airway Management Episodes

AU - Schnittker, Raphaela

AU - Marshall, Stuart

AU - Horberry, Timothy

AU - Young, Kristie

AU - Lintern, Gavan

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Anesthesia takes place in a complex, high-stakes environment where humans and technologies interact to provide medical care to patients. Providing adequate decision support for individuals and teams in anesthesia emergencies is important because emergencies are infrequent and complex. Current designs of decision support in airway management are not context specific and lack a consideration of how decisions are made under time pressure. To fill this gap, this study used frameworks from cognitive systems engineering to explore decisions of experienced anesthesia providers. The goal was to identify the decision pathways used in challenging airway management situations. The critical decision method was employed to interview anesthesia providers about a challenging incident they had experienced. Results illustrated that decisions were based on prior experience and made through a process of recognition. The vast majority of decisions were recognition primed, characterized by a direct link between cue familiarity and action generation. A few decisions involved concurrent option comparison, which was still based on situation recognition. Different cues received through teamwork, technologies, and patients contributed to the decisions. As different cognitive pathways may require different design solutions, the findings of this study are being used to help develop decision support tools in anesthesia.

AB - Anesthesia takes place in a complex, high-stakes environment where humans and technologies interact to provide medical care to patients. Providing adequate decision support for individuals and teams in anesthesia emergencies is important because emergencies are infrequent and complex. Current designs of decision support in airway management are not context specific and lack a consideration of how decisions are made under time pressure. To fill this gap, this study used frameworks from cognitive systems engineering to explore decisions of experienced anesthesia providers. The goal was to identify the decision pathways used in challenging airway management situations. The critical decision method was employed to interview anesthesia providers about a challenging incident they had experienced. Results illustrated that decisions were based on prior experience and made through a process of recognition. The vast majority of decisions were recognition primed, characterized by a direct link between cue familiarity and action generation. A few decisions involved concurrent option comparison, which was still based on situation recognition. Different cues received through teamwork, technologies, and patients contributed to the decisions. As different cognitive pathways may require different design solutions, the findings of this study are being used to help develop decision support tools in anesthesia.

KW - cognitive systems engineering

KW - cognitive task analysis

KW - domains

KW - health care delivery

KW - methods

KW - recognition-primed decision making

KW - topics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032903478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1555343417716843

DO - 10.1177/1555343417716843

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 353

EP - 370

JO - Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

JF - Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

SN - 1555-3434

IS - 4

ER -