TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring an innovative approach to teaching mathematics through the use of challenging tasks
T2 - a New Zealand perspective
AU - Ingram, Naomi
AU - Holmes, Marilyn
AU - Linsell, Chris
AU - Livy, Sharyn
AU - McCormick, Melody
AU - Sullivan, Peter
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This paper reports on a New Zealand iteration of the Encouraging Persistence, Maintaining Challenge (EPMC) project, which proposes that students learn mathematics best when they build connections between mathematical ideas for themselves. This iteration explores the actions, perceptions and learning of 12 primary teachers and their 281 students during the implementation of a set of challenging tasks related to geometric reasoning. The teachers launched the suggested tasks, ensuring that the challenge was maintained. The students explored these tasks with minimal input from the teacher, and learning was summarised and extended. The teachers were positive about the intervention. The challenging task approach enabled students’ thinking became visible and, at times, the teachers’ prior perceptions of their students’ ability were challenged. A highly significant difference between the students’ pre- and post-assessment scores was found. The students were supported to have autonomy in their learning and make mathematical connections themselves. The students became less reliant on their teachers’ help and were positive about their involvement in the project.
AB - This paper reports on a New Zealand iteration of the Encouraging Persistence, Maintaining Challenge (EPMC) project, which proposes that students learn mathematics best when they build connections between mathematical ideas for themselves. This iteration explores the actions, perceptions and learning of 12 primary teachers and their 281 students during the implementation of a set of challenging tasks related to geometric reasoning. The teachers launched the suggested tasks, ensuring that the challenge was maintained. The students explored these tasks with minimal input from the teacher, and learning was summarised and extended. The teachers were positive about the intervention. The challenging task approach enabled students’ thinking became visible and, at times, the teachers’ prior perceptions of their students’ ability were challenged. A highly significant difference between the students’ pre- and post-assessment scores was found. The students were supported to have autonomy in their learning and make mathematical connections themselves. The students became less reliant on their teachers’ help and were positive about their involvement in the project.
KW - Challenging tasks
KW - Confusion
KW - Geometry
KW - Lesson structure
KW - Mathematics
KW - Persistence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067386564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13394-019-00266-1
DO - 10.1007/s13394-019-00266-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85067386564
SN - 1033-2170
VL - 32
SP - 497
EP - 522
JO - Mathematics Education Research Journal
JF - Mathematics Education Research Journal
ER -