Objective Demoralization, a state of lowered morale and poor coping, has a prevalence of 13–18% among patients with advanced cancer. We surveyed clinicians' perspectives of the utility of “with demoralization” as a diagnostic specifier for adjustment and depressive disorders. Method Using comparative clinical vignettes in a field survey, clinicians from a range of disciplines were asked their perception of the utility of diagnosis and treatment options. Response frequencies were compared using Cochran's Q and McNemar's tests, with sensitivity and specificity rated against expert rankings of diagnosis. Analysis of variance and paired t-tests examined significant differences in ratings of utility. Results Vignettes were assessed by 280 clinicians; 77% supported utility of the category ‘adjustment disorder with demoralization’ compared to 33% supporting ‘adjustment disorder with anxiety’ (McNemar test, p < 0.001), while 83% supported the utility of ‘with demoralization’ for major depressive episode, matching 83% perceiving utility for ‘with melancholia.’ Sensitivity and specificity ratings were 77% and 94% for adjustment disorder with demoralization and 83% and 91% for major depression with demoralization. Conclusion Clinicians perceived the specifier ‘with demoralization’ to deepen diagnostic understanding, treatment choice, and ability to communicate with clinicians and patients, particularly for the category of adjustment disorder with demoralization.
|Number of pages||5|
|Journal||General Hospital Psychiatry|
|Publication status||Published - 2017|
- Diagnostic specifiers
- Adjustment disorder