Explanation in the science of consciousness: From the neural correlates of consciousness (nccs) to the difference makers of consciousness (dmcs)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The science of consciousness is currently structured around the search for the neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs). One of the alleged advantages of the NCC framework is its metaphysical neutrality—the fact that it begs no contested questions with respect to debates about the fundamental nature of consciousness. Here, we argue that even if the NCC framework is metaphysically neutral, it is structurally committed, for it presupposes a certain model—what we call the Lite-Brite model—of consciousness. This represents a serious liability for the NCC framework, for the plausibility of the Lite-Brite model is very much an open question, and the science of consciousness would be better served by a framework that does not presuppose it. Drawing on interventionist ideas in the philosophy of science, we suggest that the Difference-Maker framework can provide just such an alternative. Instead of searching for the neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs), we ought to be searching for the difference makers of consciousness (DMCs).

Original languageEnglish
Article number4
Number of pages20
JournalPhiMiSci: Philosophy and the Mind Sciences
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Consciousness
  • Difference-making· Explanation
  • Intervention
  • NCCs
  • Neural correlates

Cite this