Abstract
This commentary focuses on explaining the intuition of revelation, an issue that Chalmers (2018) raises in his paper. I first sketch how the truth of revelation provides an explanation for the intuition of revelation, and then assess a physicalist proposal to explain the intuition that appeals to Derk Pereboom’s (2011; 2016; 2019) qualitative inaccuracy hypothesis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 99-107 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Consciousness Studies |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 5-6 |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver