Expert evidence accountability: new developments and challenges.

Ian Freckelton

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A series of developments in relation to the accountability of expert witnesses and the admissibility of their opinions is taking place. This extends to encroachments in the United Kingdom on expert witness immunity, the imposition of disciplinary liability for registered health practitioners in Australia and the United Kingdom, and recommendations from the United Kingdom Law Commission for a systematised procedure for reliability determination as a prerequisite for admissibility rulings. This combination of measures is indicative of international concern about the contemporary role of expert witnesses. It highlights the need for both empirical information about whether the anecdotal and experiential concerns about expert evidence are well-founded and for the provision of better and clearer guidance to experts and litigators alike about the underpinnings and methodologies that are permissible for admissible and probative expert opinions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-224
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Law and Medicine
Volume19
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Cite this