Experimental and numerical investigations of non-standardised semi-circular bending test for asphalt concrete mixtures

Dai Xuan Lu, Nhu H.T. Nguyen, Mofreh Saleh, Ha H. Bui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Fracture due to mechanical loads is one of the main distresses of asphalt concrete (AC) pavement. Characterisation of fracture properties of AC is thus vital. The semi-circular bending (SCB) test is recognised as a simple but robust test to evaluate the fracture resistance of AC. Current SCB test standards adopt a fixed sample geometry of 150 mm diameter, while the 100 mm diameter sample has not standardised yet. However, in specifications for AC design and quality control purposes, such as indirect tensile test and resilient modulus, cylindrical samples with either 100 or 150 mm diameter obtained from existing pavements or fabricated in laboratories are used in parallel. This raises the question of whether the 100 mm diameter SCB sample is applicable. The literature review shows the limited investigation into the applicability of SCB test on 100 mm diameter. It also shows no clear justification for why standardised geometry is preferred compared to 100 mm one. For these reasons, this study attempts to investigate the applicability of the SCB test with a non-standardised 100 mm diameter samples using a combined experimental and numerical approach. The numerical approach is based on the discrete element method combining with an enriched cohesive damage-plasticity contact model suitable for AC. The predictive capability of the numerical model is first assessed against the experimental data. Subsequently, the validated numerical model is applied to investigate the effects of notch length and sample thickness on the fracture properties of AC. The study demonstrated that the proposed non-standardised sample geometry of SCB test can provide reliable results with high repeatability. Furthermore, with an appropriate notch length and sample thickness, the non-standardised test can produce a similar value of fracture toughness as the standardised test. These results suggest that the non-standardised test can be used to characterise the fracture properties of AC mixes.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Pavement Engineering
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 16 Aug 2019

Keywords

  • Asphalt concrete
  • cohesive contact model
  • discrete element method
  • fracture properties
  • semi-circular bending test

Cite this

@article{0011ffd94f074a7cae696912ed1c32cd,
title = "Experimental and numerical investigations of non-standardised semi-circular bending test for asphalt concrete mixtures",
abstract = "Fracture due to mechanical loads is one of the main distresses of asphalt concrete (AC) pavement. Characterisation of fracture properties of AC is thus vital. The semi-circular bending (SCB) test is recognised as a simple but robust test to evaluate the fracture resistance of AC. Current SCB test standards adopt a fixed sample geometry of 150 mm diameter, while the 100 mm diameter sample has not standardised yet. However, in specifications for AC design and quality control purposes, such as indirect tensile test and resilient modulus, cylindrical samples with either 100 or 150 mm diameter obtained from existing pavements or fabricated in laboratories are used in parallel. This raises the question of whether the 100 mm diameter SCB sample is applicable. The literature review shows the limited investigation into the applicability of SCB test on 100 mm diameter. It also shows no clear justification for why standardised geometry is preferred compared to 100 mm one. For these reasons, this study attempts to investigate the applicability of the SCB test with a non-standardised 100 mm diameter samples using a combined experimental and numerical approach. The numerical approach is based on the discrete element method combining with an enriched cohesive damage-plasticity contact model suitable for AC. The predictive capability of the numerical model is first assessed against the experimental data. Subsequently, the validated numerical model is applied to investigate the effects of notch length and sample thickness on the fracture properties of AC. The study demonstrated that the proposed non-standardised sample geometry of SCB test can provide reliable results with high repeatability. Furthermore, with an appropriate notch length and sample thickness, the non-standardised test can produce a similar value of fracture toughness as the standardised test. These results suggest that the non-standardised test can be used to characterise the fracture properties of AC mixes.",
keywords = "Asphalt concrete, cohesive contact model, discrete element method, fracture properties, semi-circular bending test",
author = "Lu, {Dai Xuan} and Nguyen, {Nhu H.T.} and Mofreh Saleh and Bui, {Ha H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1080/10298436.2019.1654608",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Pavement Engineering",
issn = "1029-8436",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental and numerical investigations of non-standardised semi-circular bending test for asphalt concrete mixtures

AU - Lu, Dai Xuan

AU - Nguyen, Nhu H.T.

AU - Saleh, Mofreh

AU - Bui, Ha H.

PY - 2019/8/16

Y1 - 2019/8/16

N2 - Fracture due to mechanical loads is one of the main distresses of asphalt concrete (AC) pavement. Characterisation of fracture properties of AC is thus vital. The semi-circular bending (SCB) test is recognised as a simple but robust test to evaluate the fracture resistance of AC. Current SCB test standards adopt a fixed sample geometry of 150 mm diameter, while the 100 mm diameter sample has not standardised yet. However, in specifications for AC design and quality control purposes, such as indirect tensile test and resilient modulus, cylindrical samples with either 100 or 150 mm diameter obtained from existing pavements or fabricated in laboratories are used in parallel. This raises the question of whether the 100 mm diameter SCB sample is applicable. The literature review shows the limited investigation into the applicability of SCB test on 100 mm diameter. It also shows no clear justification for why standardised geometry is preferred compared to 100 mm one. For these reasons, this study attempts to investigate the applicability of the SCB test with a non-standardised 100 mm diameter samples using a combined experimental and numerical approach. The numerical approach is based on the discrete element method combining with an enriched cohesive damage-plasticity contact model suitable for AC. The predictive capability of the numerical model is first assessed against the experimental data. Subsequently, the validated numerical model is applied to investigate the effects of notch length and sample thickness on the fracture properties of AC. The study demonstrated that the proposed non-standardised sample geometry of SCB test can provide reliable results with high repeatability. Furthermore, with an appropriate notch length and sample thickness, the non-standardised test can produce a similar value of fracture toughness as the standardised test. These results suggest that the non-standardised test can be used to characterise the fracture properties of AC mixes.

AB - Fracture due to mechanical loads is one of the main distresses of asphalt concrete (AC) pavement. Characterisation of fracture properties of AC is thus vital. The semi-circular bending (SCB) test is recognised as a simple but robust test to evaluate the fracture resistance of AC. Current SCB test standards adopt a fixed sample geometry of 150 mm diameter, while the 100 mm diameter sample has not standardised yet. However, in specifications for AC design and quality control purposes, such as indirect tensile test and resilient modulus, cylindrical samples with either 100 or 150 mm diameter obtained from existing pavements or fabricated in laboratories are used in parallel. This raises the question of whether the 100 mm diameter SCB sample is applicable. The literature review shows the limited investigation into the applicability of SCB test on 100 mm diameter. It also shows no clear justification for why standardised geometry is preferred compared to 100 mm one. For these reasons, this study attempts to investigate the applicability of the SCB test with a non-standardised 100 mm diameter samples using a combined experimental and numerical approach. The numerical approach is based on the discrete element method combining with an enriched cohesive damage-plasticity contact model suitable for AC. The predictive capability of the numerical model is first assessed against the experimental data. Subsequently, the validated numerical model is applied to investigate the effects of notch length and sample thickness on the fracture properties of AC. The study demonstrated that the proposed non-standardised sample geometry of SCB test can provide reliable results with high repeatability. Furthermore, with an appropriate notch length and sample thickness, the non-standardised test can produce a similar value of fracture toughness as the standardised test. These results suggest that the non-standardised test can be used to characterise the fracture properties of AC mixes.

KW - Asphalt concrete

KW - cohesive contact model

KW - discrete element method

KW - fracture properties

KW - semi-circular bending test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070996394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10298436.2019.1654608

DO - 10.1080/10298436.2019.1654608

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Pavement Engineering

JF - International Journal of Pavement Engineering

SN - 1029-8436

ER -