Experience and facilitating conditions as impediments to consumers’ new technology adoption

Harryadin Mahardika, Dominic Thomas, Michael Thomas Ewing, Arnold Japutra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The recent proliferation of new technologies and impediments to their adoption has made predicting new technology adoption/use complex and challenging. This paper aims to compare the predictive ability of behavioural expectation (BE) and behavioural intention (BI) given such impediments. BE predicts an attempt to perform a targeted behaviour, whereas BI predicts the likelihood of actually performing a targeted behaviour. An online longitudinal experiment was designed to examine the effects of two contrasting sources of impediments to new technology adoption: experience (internal) and facilitating conditions (external). The results confirm the tendency of subjects, who responded to BI measures, to make overestimations when they think they have more control over the (internal) impediments, and to make exaggerated underestimations when they think they have less control over the (external) impediments. Moreover, it is found that subjects who responded to BE measures have a stronger adoption–use correlation compared to subjects who responded to BI measures regardless of the type of impediments encountered. This study offers a basis for marketers to increase the rate of consumers’ adoption/use of new technology such as mobile applications. The research identifies boundary conditions to the predictive ability of BE and BI in the context of mobile applications adoption/use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-98
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • behavioural expectations
  • behavioural intentions
  • experience
  • facilitating conditions
  • Impediments

Cite this

@article{de6757add6754375b568888fdab14336,
title = "Experience and facilitating conditions as impediments to consumers’ new technology adoption",
abstract = "The recent proliferation of new technologies and impediments to their adoption has made predicting new technology adoption/use complex and challenging. This paper aims to compare the predictive ability of behavioural expectation (BE) and behavioural intention (BI) given such impediments. BE predicts an attempt to perform a targeted behaviour, whereas BI predicts the likelihood of actually performing a targeted behaviour. An online longitudinal experiment was designed to examine the effects of two contrasting sources of impediments to new technology adoption: experience (internal) and facilitating conditions (external). The results confirm the tendency of subjects, who responded to BI measures, to make overestimations when they think they have more control over the (internal) impediments, and to make exaggerated underestimations when they think they have less control over the (external) impediments. Moreover, it is found that subjects who responded to BE measures have a stronger adoption–use correlation compared to subjects who responded to BI measures regardless of the type of impediments encountered. This study offers a basis for marketers to increase the rate of consumers’ adoption/use of new technology such as mobile applications. The research identifies boundary conditions to the predictive ability of BE and BI in the context of mobile applications adoption/use.",
keywords = "behavioural expectations, behavioural intentions, experience, facilitating conditions, Impediments",
author = "Harryadin Mahardika and Dominic Thomas and Ewing, {Michael Thomas} and Arnold Japutra",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09593969.2018.1556181",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "79--98",
journal = "International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research",
issn = "0959-3969",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Experience and facilitating conditions as impediments to consumers’ new technology adoption. / Mahardika, Harryadin; Thomas, Dominic; Ewing, Michael Thomas; Japutra, Arnold.

In: International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 79-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experience and facilitating conditions as impediments to consumers’ new technology adoption

AU - Mahardika, Harryadin

AU - Thomas, Dominic

AU - Ewing, Michael Thomas

AU - Japutra, Arnold

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The recent proliferation of new technologies and impediments to their adoption has made predicting new technology adoption/use complex and challenging. This paper aims to compare the predictive ability of behavioural expectation (BE) and behavioural intention (BI) given such impediments. BE predicts an attempt to perform a targeted behaviour, whereas BI predicts the likelihood of actually performing a targeted behaviour. An online longitudinal experiment was designed to examine the effects of two contrasting sources of impediments to new technology adoption: experience (internal) and facilitating conditions (external). The results confirm the tendency of subjects, who responded to BI measures, to make overestimations when they think they have more control over the (internal) impediments, and to make exaggerated underestimations when they think they have less control over the (external) impediments. Moreover, it is found that subjects who responded to BE measures have a stronger adoption–use correlation compared to subjects who responded to BI measures regardless of the type of impediments encountered. This study offers a basis for marketers to increase the rate of consumers’ adoption/use of new technology such as mobile applications. The research identifies boundary conditions to the predictive ability of BE and BI in the context of mobile applications adoption/use.

AB - The recent proliferation of new technologies and impediments to their adoption has made predicting new technology adoption/use complex and challenging. This paper aims to compare the predictive ability of behavioural expectation (BE) and behavioural intention (BI) given such impediments. BE predicts an attempt to perform a targeted behaviour, whereas BI predicts the likelihood of actually performing a targeted behaviour. An online longitudinal experiment was designed to examine the effects of two contrasting sources of impediments to new technology adoption: experience (internal) and facilitating conditions (external). The results confirm the tendency of subjects, who responded to BI measures, to make overestimations when they think they have more control over the (internal) impediments, and to make exaggerated underestimations when they think they have less control over the (external) impediments. Moreover, it is found that subjects who responded to BE measures have a stronger adoption–use correlation compared to subjects who responded to BI measures regardless of the type of impediments encountered. This study offers a basis for marketers to increase the rate of consumers’ adoption/use of new technology such as mobile applications. The research identifies boundary conditions to the predictive ability of BE and BI in the context of mobile applications adoption/use.

KW - behavioural expectations

KW - behavioural intentions

KW - experience

KW - facilitating conditions

KW - Impediments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059150677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09593969.2018.1556181

DO - 10.1080/09593969.2018.1556181

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 79

EP - 98

JO - International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research

JF - International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research

SN - 0959-3969

IS - 1

ER -