Evolutionary consequences of sex-specific selection in variable environments

Four simple models reveal diverse evolutionary outcomes

Tim Connallon, Shefali Sharma, Colin John Olito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The evolutionary trajectories of species with separate sexes depend on the effects of genetic variation on female and male traits as well as the direction and alignment of selection between the sexes. Classical theory has shown that evolution is equally responsive to selection on females and males, with natural selection increasing the product of the average relative fitness of each sex over time. This simple rule underlies several important predictions regarding the maintenance of genetic variation, the genetic basis of adaptation, and the dynamics of “sexually antagonistic” alleles. Nevertheless, theories of sex-specific selection overwhelmingly focus on evolution in constant environments, and it remains unclear whether they apply under changing conditions. We derived four simple models of sex-specific selection in variable environments and explored how conditions of population subdivision, the timing of dispersal, sex differences in dispersal, and the nature of environmental change mediate the evolutionary dynamics of sex-specific adaptation. We find that these dynamics are acutely sensitive to ecological, demographic, and life-history attributes that vary widely among species, with classical predictions breaking down in contexts of environmental heterogeneity. The evolutionary rules governing sex-specific adaptation may therefore differ between species, suggesting new avenues for research on the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-105
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume193
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Balancing selection
  • Hard selection
  • Polymorphism
  • Sexual antagonism
  • Sexual dimorphism
  • Soft selection

Cite this

@article{33cf65d982d2444689746d057ea70500,
title = "Evolutionary consequences of sex-specific selection in variable environments: Four simple models reveal diverse evolutionary outcomes",
abstract = "The evolutionary trajectories of species with separate sexes depend on the effects of genetic variation on female and male traits as well as the direction and alignment of selection between the sexes. Classical theory has shown that evolution is equally responsive to selection on females and males, with natural selection increasing the product of the average relative fitness of each sex over time. This simple rule underlies several important predictions regarding the maintenance of genetic variation, the genetic basis of adaptation, and the dynamics of “sexually antagonistic” alleles. Nevertheless, theories of sex-specific selection overwhelmingly focus on evolution in constant environments, and it remains unclear whether they apply under changing conditions. We derived four simple models of sex-specific selection in variable environments and explored how conditions of population subdivision, the timing of dispersal, sex differences in dispersal, and the nature of environmental change mediate the evolutionary dynamics of sex-specific adaptation. We find that these dynamics are acutely sensitive to ecological, demographic, and life-history attributes that vary widely among species, with classical predictions breaking down in contexts of environmental heterogeneity. The evolutionary rules governing sex-specific adaptation may therefore differ between species, suggesting new avenues for research on the evolution of sexual dimorphism.",
keywords = "Balancing selection, Hard selection, Polymorphism, Sexual antagonism, Sexual dimorphism, Soft selection",
author = "Tim Connallon and Shefali Sharma and Olito, {Colin John}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/700720",
language = "English",
volume = "193",
pages = "93--105",
journal = "American Naturalist",
issn = "0003-0147",
publisher = "The University of Chicago Press",
number = "1",

}

Evolutionary consequences of sex-specific selection in variable environments : Four simple models reveal diverse evolutionary outcomes. / Connallon, Tim; Sharma, Shefali; Olito, Colin John.

In: American Naturalist, Vol. 193, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 93-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolutionary consequences of sex-specific selection in variable environments

T2 - Four simple models reveal diverse evolutionary outcomes

AU - Connallon, Tim

AU - Sharma, Shefali

AU - Olito, Colin John

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The evolutionary trajectories of species with separate sexes depend on the effects of genetic variation on female and male traits as well as the direction and alignment of selection between the sexes. Classical theory has shown that evolution is equally responsive to selection on females and males, with natural selection increasing the product of the average relative fitness of each sex over time. This simple rule underlies several important predictions regarding the maintenance of genetic variation, the genetic basis of adaptation, and the dynamics of “sexually antagonistic” alleles. Nevertheless, theories of sex-specific selection overwhelmingly focus on evolution in constant environments, and it remains unclear whether they apply under changing conditions. We derived four simple models of sex-specific selection in variable environments and explored how conditions of population subdivision, the timing of dispersal, sex differences in dispersal, and the nature of environmental change mediate the evolutionary dynamics of sex-specific adaptation. We find that these dynamics are acutely sensitive to ecological, demographic, and life-history attributes that vary widely among species, with classical predictions breaking down in contexts of environmental heterogeneity. The evolutionary rules governing sex-specific adaptation may therefore differ between species, suggesting new avenues for research on the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

AB - The evolutionary trajectories of species with separate sexes depend on the effects of genetic variation on female and male traits as well as the direction and alignment of selection between the sexes. Classical theory has shown that evolution is equally responsive to selection on females and males, with natural selection increasing the product of the average relative fitness of each sex over time. This simple rule underlies several important predictions regarding the maintenance of genetic variation, the genetic basis of adaptation, and the dynamics of “sexually antagonistic” alleles. Nevertheless, theories of sex-specific selection overwhelmingly focus on evolution in constant environments, and it remains unclear whether they apply under changing conditions. We derived four simple models of sex-specific selection in variable environments and explored how conditions of population subdivision, the timing of dispersal, sex differences in dispersal, and the nature of environmental change mediate the evolutionary dynamics of sex-specific adaptation. We find that these dynamics are acutely sensitive to ecological, demographic, and life-history attributes that vary widely among species, with classical predictions breaking down in contexts of environmental heterogeneity. The evolutionary rules governing sex-specific adaptation may therefore differ between species, suggesting new avenues for research on the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

KW - Balancing selection

KW - Hard selection

KW - Polymorphism

KW - Sexual antagonism

KW - Sexual dimorphism

KW - Soft selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056790812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/700720

DO - 10.1086/700720

M3 - Article

VL - 193

SP - 93

EP - 105

JO - American Naturalist

JF - American Naturalist

SN - 0003-0147

IS - 1

ER -