Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas

Rajab Khalilpour, I. A. Karimi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Options for exporting natural gas from stranded oil and gas fields to markets include pipelines, LNG (liquefied natural gas), CNG (compressed natural gas), GTL (gas to liquids), GTS (gas to solids), and GTW (gas to wire). Thus, the key question is which option is the most robust in ensuring the security of investment over a project life cycle against market fluctuations, trade embargos, political changes, technical advances, etc. Excluding pipelines, LNG, CNG, and GTL have attracted increasing investor attention during the last two decades. Although studies abound on economic comparisons of these processes, a systematic method to address this important problem in the presence of uncertainty seems missing in the literature. This work presents such a method based on decision analysis cycle and considers oil and gas prices as uncertain. Using NPV (net present value) as the decision criterion, it presents the computation of "expected NPV" of each gas utilization alternative to identify the best option. It includes the entire well-to-market supply chain, from extraction, conversion, and transportation, to re-conversion at the target market. Finally, it identifies the sweet spots for LNG, CNG, and GTL alternatives for different reservoir capacities and market distances.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-328
Number of pages12
JournalEnergy
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CNG
  • Decision analysis
  • GTL
  • LNG
  • Natural gas field development
  • Supply chain

Cite this

Khalilpour, Rajab ; Karimi, I. A. / Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas. In: Energy. 2012 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 317-328.
@article{d1b3689a33ff4d4794da748c0545e5ec,
title = "Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas",
abstract = "Options for exporting natural gas from stranded oil and gas fields to markets include pipelines, LNG (liquefied natural gas), CNG (compressed natural gas), GTL (gas to liquids), GTS (gas to solids), and GTW (gas to wire). Thus, the key question is which option is the most robust in ensuring the security of investment over a project life cycle against market fluctuations, trade embargos, political changes, technical advances, etc. Excluding pipelines, LNG, CNG, and GTL have attracted increasing investor attention during the last two decades. Although studies abound on economic comparisons of these processes, a systematic method to address this important problem in the presence of uncertainty seems missing in the literature. This work presents such a method based on decision analysis cycle and considers oil and gas prices as uncertain. Using NPV (net present value) as the decision criterion, it presents the computation of {"}expected NPV{"} of each gas utilization alternative to identify the best option. It includes the entire well-to-market supply chain, from extraction, conversion, and transportation, to re-conversion at the target market. Finally, it identifies the sweet spots for LNG, CNG, and GTL alternatives for different reservoir capacities and market distances.",
keywords = "CNG, Decision analysis, GTL, LNG, Natural gas field development, Supply chain",
author = "Rajab Khalilpour and Karimi, {I. A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.068",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "317--328",
journal = "Energy",
issn = "0360-5442",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas. / Khalilpour, Rajab; Karimi, I. A.

In: Energy, Vol. 40, No. 1, 04.2012, p. 317-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas

AU - Khalilpour, Rajab

AU - Karimi, I. A.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Options for exporting natural gas from stranded oil and gas fields to markets include pipelines, LNG (liquefied natural gas), CNG (compressed natural gas), GTL (gas to liquids), GTS (gas to solids), and GTW (gas to wire). Thus, the key question is which option is the most robust in ensuring the security of investment over a project life cycle against market fluctuations, trade embargos, political changes, technical advances, etc. Excluding pipelines, LNG, CNG, and GTL have attracted increasing investor attention during the last two decades. Although studies abound on economic comparisons of these processes, a systematic method to address this important problem in the presence of uncertainty seems missing in the literature. This work presents such a method based on decision analysis cycle and considers oil and gas prices as uncertain. Using NPV (net present value) as the decision criterion, it presents the computation of "expected NPV" of each gas utilization alternative to identify the best option. It includes the entire well-to-market supply chain, from extraction, conversion, and transportation, to re-conversion at the target market. Finally, it identifies the sweet spots for LNG, CNG, and GTL alternatives for different reservoir capacities and market distances.

AB - Options for exporting natural gas from stranded oil and gas fields to markets include pipelines, LNG (liquefied natural gas), CNG (compressed natural gas), GTL (gas to liquids), GTS (gas to solids), and GTW (gas to wire). Thus, the key question is which option is the most robust in ensuring the security of investment over a project life cycle against market fluctuations, trade embargos, political changes, technical advances, etc. Excluding pipelines, LNG, CNG, and GTL have attracted increasing investor attention during the last two decades. Although studies abound on economic comparisons of these processes, a systematic method to address this important problem in the presence of uncertainty seems missing in the literature. This work presents such a method based on decision analysis cycle and considers oil and gas prices as uncertain. Using NPV (net present value) as the decision criterion, it presents the computation of "expected NPV" of each gas utilization alternative to identify the best option. It includes the entire well-to-market supply chain, from extraction, conversion, and transportation, to re-conversion at the target market. Finally, it identifies the sweet spots for LNG, CNG, and GTL alternatives for different reservoir capacities and market distances.

KW - CNG

KW - Decision analysis

KW - GTL

KW - LNG

KW - Natural gas field development

KW - Supply chain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859107389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.068

DO - 10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.068

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 317

EP - 328

JO - Energy

JF - Energy

SN - 0360-5442

IS - 1

ER -