Evaluation of the Implementation of a New Nurse-Led Express "test-And-Go" Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Service for Men Who Have Sex with Men at a Sexual Health Center in Melbourne, Australia

Eric P.F. Chow, Ria Fortune, Sheranne Dobinson, Trish Wakefield, Tim R.H. Read, Marcus Y Chen, Catriona S Bradshaw, Glenda Fehler, Christopher K Fairley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background In August 2015, a nurse-led express human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing service "Test-And-Go" (TAG) for asymptomatic men who have sex with men (MSM) was implemented in a large public sexual health center in Melbourne, Australia. We aimed to compare the clients' characteristics between the TAG and routine walk-in service among asymptomatic MSM. Methods This study was conducted at the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Australia, between August 5, 2015, and June 1, 2016. General estimating equation logistic regression models were constructed to examine the association between the use of TAG service and clients' demographic characteristics, sexual behaviors, and HIV/STI positivity. Clients' consultation and waiting times for both services were calculated. Results Of the 3520 consultations, 784 (22.3%) were TAG services and 2736 (77.7%) were routine walk-in services for asymptomatic MSM. Asymptomatic MSM were more likely to use the TAG service if they were born in Australia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.56), and had more than 6 male partners in the last 12 months (adjusted odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.58). Age, HIV status, condomless anal sex and HIV/STI positivity did not differ between the two services. The TAG service had a shorter median waiting time (8.4 minutes vs 52.9 minutes; p < 0.001) and consultation time (8.9 minutes vs 17.6 minutes; p < 0.001) than the routine walk-in service. Conclusions Although country of birth and sexual behaviors differed between clients attending the 2 services, there were no differences in HIV and STI positivity. Importantly, the TAG service required less waiting and consultation time and hence created additional clinic capacity at the general clinic to see clients who are at higher risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-434
Number of pages6
JournalSexually Transmitted Diseases
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Keywords

  • HIV
  • Prevention
  • Screening
  • Sexually transmissible infection
  • health service
  • Sexual health

Cite this