Evaluation of novel urban rail level crossing designs using driving simulation

Gemma Jennie Megan Read; Amanda Clacy; Miles Thomas; M Van Mulken; Nicholas Stevens; Michael Graeme Lenne; Christine Maree Mulvihill; Neville Anthony Stanton; Guy Harrison Walker; Kristie Lee Young; Paul Salmon

doi:10.1177/1541931213601438

Evaluation of novel urban rail level crossing designs using driving simulation

Gemma Jennie Megan Read, Amanda Clacy, Miles Thomas, M Van Mulken, Nicholas Stevens, Michael Graeme Lenne, Christine Maree Mulvihill, Neville Anthony Stanton, Guy Harrison Walker, Kristie Lee Young, Paul Salmon

Monash University Accident Research Centre

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference Paper › Research › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Copyright 2016 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Rail level crossings (RLXs) are a public safety concern internationally. The design of the RLX environment has been implicated in many recent crashes. In this study we evaluated three novel RLX design concepts using a driving simulator. Participants completed four drives, each incorporating one of the RLX designs (one baseline and three novel designs) in both train coming and train not coming mode. Measures of speed and braking on approach were analyzed, along with subjective measures of workload and usability. Superior driving behavior and subjective ratings were achieved for a design that incorporated an in-vehicle device while the lowest subjective ratings were given in relation to a shared space design that incorporated a simplified crossing environment and sharing of the road environment between motorized and non-motorized users. The implications for RLX safety are discussed.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting
Place of Publication	California USA
Publisher	SAGE Publications Ltd
Pages	1921-1925
Number of pages	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601438
Publication status	Published - 2016
Event	International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2016 - Washington Hilton, Washington, United States of America Duration: 19 Sep 2016 → 23 Sep 2016 Conference number: 60th https://www.hfes.org/web/HFESMeetings/2016annualmeeting.html

Publication series

Name	Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Publisher	SAGE Publications Ltd
ISSN (Print)	1071-1813

Conference

Conference	International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2016
Abbreviated title	HFES 2016
Country/Territory	United States of America
City	Washington
Period	19/09/16 → 23/09/16
Internet address	https://www.hfes.org/web/HFESMeetings/2016annualmeeting.html

Access to Document

10.1177/1541931213601438

Cite this

Read, G. J. M., Clacy, A., Thomas, M., Van Mulken, M., Stevens, N., Lenne, M. G., Mulvihill, C. M., Stanton, N. A., Walker, G. H., Young, K. L., & Salmon, P. (2016). Evaluation of novel urban rail level crossing designs using driving simulation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting (pp. 1921-1925). (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601438

Read, Gemma Jennie Megan ; Clacy, Amanda ; Thomas, Miles ; Van Mulken, M ; Stevens, Nicholas ; Lenne, Michael Graeme ; Mulvihill, Christine Maree ; Stanton, Neville Anthony ; Walker, Guy Harrison ; Young, Kristie Lee ; Salmon, Paul. / Evaluation of novel urban rail level crossing designs using driving simulation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting. California USA : SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016. pp. 1921-1925 (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).

@inproceedings{b8e5fb8ad51b44b88f5b0560cd036c71,

title = "Evaluation of novel urban rail level crossing designs using driving simulation",

abstract = "Copyright 2016 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Rail level crossings (RLXs) are a public safety concern internationally. The design of the RLX environment has been implicated in many recent crashes. In this study we evaluated three novel RLX design concepts using a driving simulator. Participants completed four drives, each incorporating one of the RLX designs (one baseline and three novel designs) in both train coming and train not coming mode. Measures of speed and braking on approach were analyzed, along with subjective measures of workload and usability. Superior driving behavior and subjective ratings were achieved for a design that incorporated an in-vehicle device while the lowest subjective ratings were given in relation to a shared space design that incorporated a simplified crossing environment and sharing of the road environment between motorized and non-motorized users. The implications for RLX safety are discussed.",

author = "Read, {Gemma Jennie Megan} and Amanda Clacy and Miles Thomas and {Van Mulken}, M and Nicholas Stevens and Lenne, {Michael Graeme} and Mulvihill, {Christine Maree} and Stanton, {Neville Anthony} and Walker, {Guy Harrison} and Young, {Kristie Lee} and Paul Salmon",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1177/1541931213601438",

language = "English",

series = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

pages = "1921--1925",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting",

note = "International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2016, HFES 2016 ; Conference date: 19-09-2016 Through 23-09-2016",

url = "https://www.hfes.org/web/HFESMeetings/2016annualmeeting.html",

}

Read, GJM, Clacy, A, Thomas, M, Van Mulken, M, Stevens, N, Lenne, MG, Mulvihill, CM, Stanton, NA, Walker, GH, Young, KL & Salmon, P 2016, Evaluation of novel urban rail level crossing designs using driving simulation. in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, SAGE Publications Ltd, California USA, pp. 1921-1925, International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2016, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America, 19/09/16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601438

Evaluation of novel urban rail level crossing designs using driving simulation. / Read, Gemma Jennie Megan; Clacy, Amanda; Thomas, Miles; Van Mulken, M; Stevens, Nicholas; Lenne, Michael Graeme; Mulvihill, Christine Maree; Stanton, Neville Anthony; Walker, Guy Harrison; Young, Kristie Lee; Salmon, Paul.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting. California USA : SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016. p. 1921-1925 (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference Paper › Research › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Evaluation of novel urban rail level crossing designs using driving simulation

AU - Read, Gemma Jennie Megan

AU - Clacy, Amanda

AU - Thomas, Miles

AU - Van Mulken, M

AU - Stevens, Nicholas

AU - Lenne, Michael Graeme

AU - Mulvihill, Christine Maree

AU - Stanton, Neville Anthony

AU - Walker, Guy Harrison

AU - Young, Kristie Lee

AU - Salmon, Paul

N1 - Conference code: 60th

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Copyright 2016 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Rail level crossings (RLXs) are a public safety concern internationally. The design of the RLX environment has been implicated in many recent crashes. In this study we evaluated three novel RLX design concepts using a driving simulator. Participants completed four drives, each incorporating one of the RLX designs (one baseline and three novel designs) in both train coming and train not coming mode. Measures of speed and braking on approach were analyzed, along with subjective measures of workload and usability. Superior driving behavior and subjective ratings were achieved for a design that incorporated an in-vehicle device while the lowest subjective ratings were given in relation to a shared space design that incorporated a simplified crossing environment and sharing of the road environment between motorized and non-motorized users. The implications for RLX safety are discussed.

AB - Copyright 2016 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Rail level crossings (RLXs) are a public safety concern internationally. The design of the RLX environment has been implicated in many recent crashes. In this study we evaluated three novel RLX design concepts using a driving simulator. Participants completed four drives, each incorporating one of the RLX designs (one baseline and three novel designs) in both train coming and train not coming mode. Measures of speed and braking on approach were analyzed, along with subjective measures of workload and usability. Superior driving behavior and subjective ratings were achieved for a design that incorporated an in-vehicle device while the lowest subjective ratings were given in relation to a shared space design that incorporated a simplified crossing environment and sharing of the road environment between motorized and non-motorized users. The implications for RLX safety are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021834015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1541931213601438

DO - 10.1177/1541931213601438

M3 - Conference Paper

AN - SCOPUS:85021834015

T3 - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

SP - 1921

EP - 1925

BT - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting

PB - SAGE Publications Ltd

CY - California USA

T2 - International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2016

Y2 - 19 September 2016 through 23 September 2016

ER -

Read GJM, Clacy A, Thomas M, Van Mulken M, Stevens N, Lenne MG et al. Evaluation of novel urban rail level crossing designs using driving simulation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting. California USA: SAGE Publications Ltd. 2016. p. 1921-1925. (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601438

Evaluation of novel urban rail level crossing designs using driving simulation

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this