TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of groundwater simulations in Benin from the ALMIP2 project
AU - Rashid, Mehnaz
AU - Chien, Rong You
AU - Ducharne, Agnès
AU - Kim, Hyungjun
AU - Yeh, Pat J.F.
AU - Peugeot, Christophe
AU - Boone, Aaron
AU - He, Xiaogang
AU - Séguis, Luc
AU - Yabu, Yutaro
AU - Boukari, Moussa
AU - Lo, Min Hui
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the MOST 104-2923-M-002-002-MY4 to National Taiwan University and by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANRGrant ANR-14-CE01-0018-01).Mehnaz Rashid is also supported by Grant MOST 107-2811-M-002-016. ALMIP2 was supported by the French National Programs EC2CO/INSU and LEFE/INSU. AMMACATCH is mainly supported by IRD and CNRS-INSU (France); the ground datasets are available online (http://www.amma-catch.org).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Meteorological Society.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - A comprehensive estimation of water budget components, particularly groundwater storage (GWS) and fluxes, is crucial. In this study, we evaluate the terrestrial water budget of theDonga basin (Benin, WestAfrica), as simulated by three land surface models (LSMs) used in the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis Land Surface Model Intercomparison Project, phase 2 (ALMIP2): CLM4, Catchment LSM (CLSM), and Minimal Advanced Treatments of Surface Interaction and Runoff (MATSIRO). All three models include an unconfined groundwater component and are driven by the same ALMIP2 atmospheric forcing from 2005 to 2008. Results show that all three models simulate substantially shallower water table depth (WTD) with smaller seasonal variations, approximately 1-1.5m compared to the observed values that range between 4 and 9.6m, while the seasonal variations of GWS are overestimated by all the models. These seemingly contradictory simulation results can be explained by the overly high specific yield prescribed in allmodels. All models achieve similar GWS simulations but with different fractions of precipitation partitioning into surface runoff, base flow, and evapotranspiration (ET), suggesting high uncertainty and errors in the terrestrial and groundwater budgets among models. The poor performances of models can be attributed to bias in the hydrological partitioning (base flow vs surface runoff) and sparse subsurface data. This analysis confirms the importance of subsurface hydrological processes in the current generation of LSMs and calls for substantial improvement in both surface water budget (which controls groundwater recharge) and the groundwater system (hydrodynamic parameters, vertical geometry).
AB - A comprehensive estimation of water budget components, particularly groundwater storage (GWS) and fluxes, is crucial. In this study, we evaluate the terrestrial water budget of theDonga basin (Benin, WestAfrica), as simulated by three land surface models (LSMs) used in the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis Land Surface Model Intercomparison Project, phase 2 (ALMIP2): CLM4, Catchment LSM (CLSM), and Minimal Advanced Treatments of Surface Interaction and Runoff (MATSIRO). All three models include an unconfined groundwater component and are driven by the same ALMIP2 atmospheric forcing from 2005 to 2008. Results show that all three models simulate substantially shallower water table depth (WTD) with smaller seasonal variations, approximately 1-1.5m compared to the observed values that range between 4 and 9.6m, while the seasonal variations of GWS are overestimated by all the models. These seemingly contradictory simulation results can be explained by the overly high specific yield prescribed in allmodels. All models achieve similar GWS simulations but with different fractions of precipitation partitioning into surface runoff, base flow, and evapotranspiration (ET), suggesting high uncertainty and errors in the terrestrial and groundwater budgets among models. The poor performances of models can be attributed to bias in the hydrological partitioning (base flow vs surface runoff) and sparse subsurface data. This analysis confirms the importance of subsurface hydrological processes in the current generation of LSMs and calls for substantial improvement in both surface water budget (which controls groundwater recharge) and the groundwater system (hydrodynamic parameters, vertical geometry).
KW - Atmosphere-land interaction
KW - Hydrologic cycle
KW - Hydrology
KW - Hydrometeorology
KW - Land surface model
KW - Model evaluation/performance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063596209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1175/JHM-D-18-0025.1
DO - 10.1175/JHM-D-18-0025.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85063596209
VL - 20
SP - 339
EP - 354
JO - Journal of Hydrometeorology
JF - Journal of Hydrometeorology
SN - 1525-755X
IS - 2
ER -