Evaluation and extension of the two-site, two-step model for binding and activation of the chemokine receptor CCR1

Julie Sanchez, Zil e Huma, J. Robert Lane, Xuyu Liu, Jessica L. Bridgford, Richard J. Payne, Meritxell Canals, Martin J. Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Interactions between secreted immune proteins called chemokines and their cognate G protein– coupled receptors regulate the trafficking of leukocytes in inflammatory responses. The two-site, two-step model describes these interactions. It involves initial binding of the chemokine N-loop/3 region to the receptor’s N-terminal region and subsequent insertion of the chemokine N-terminal region into the transmembrane helical bundle of the receptor concurrent with receptor activation. Here, we test aspects of this model with C-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) and several chemokine ligands. First, we compared the chemokine-binding affinities of CCR1 with those of peptides corresponding to the CCR1 N-terminal region. Relatively low affinities of the peptides and poor correlations between CCR1 and peptide affinities indicated that other regions of the receptor may contribute to binding affinity. Second, we evaluated the contributions of the two CCR1-interacting regions of the cognate chemokine ligand CCL7 (formerly monocyte chemoattractant protein-3 (MCP-3)) using chimeras between CCL7 and the non-cognate ligand CCL2 (formerly MCP-1). The results revealed that the chemokine N-terminal region contributes significantly to binding affinity but that differences in binding affinity do not completely account for differences in receptor activation. On the basis of these observations, we propose an elaboration of the two-site, two-step model—the “three-step” model—in which initial interactions of the first site result in low-affinity, nonspecific binding; rate-limiting engagement of the second site enables high-affinity, specific binding; and subsequent conformational rearrangement gives rise to receptor activation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3464-3475
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Biological Chemistry
Volume294
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • chemokine
  • chemokine receptor
  • CCR1
  • binding
  • receptor activation
  • three-step model
  • cytokine
  • innate immunity

Cite this

Sanchez, Julie ; Huma, Zil e ; Lane, J. Robert ; Liu, Xuyu ; Bridgford, Jessica L. ; Payne, Richard J. ; Canals, Meritxell ; Stone, Martin J. / Evaluation and extension of the two-site, two-step model for binding and activation of the chemokine receptor CCR1. In: Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2019 ; Vol. 294, No. 10. pp. 3464-3475.
@article{18486704d4ee4799b88132ff7c708497,
title = "Evaluation and extension of the two-site, two-step model for binding and activation of the chemokine receptor CCR1",
abstract = "Interactions between secreted immune proteins called chemokines and their cognate G protein– coupled receptors regulate the trafficking of leukocytes in inflammatory responses. The two-site, two-step model describes these interactions. It involves initial binding of the chemokine N-loop/3 region to the receptor’s N-terminal region and subsequent insertion of the chemokine N-terminal region into the transmembrane helical bundle of the receptor concurrent with receptor activation. Here, we test aspects of this model with C-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) and several chemokine ligands. First, we compared the chemokine-binding affinities of CCR1 with those of peptides corresponding to the CCR1 N-terminal region. Relatively low affinities of the peptides and poor correlations between CCR1 and peptide affinities indicated that other regions of the receptor may contribute to binding affinity. Second, we evaluated the contributions of the two CCR1-interacting regions of the cognate chemokine ligand CCL7 (formerly monocyte chemoattractant protein-3 (MCP-3)) using chimeras between CCL7 and the non-cognate ligand CCL2 (formerly MCP-1). The results revealed that the chemokine N-terminal region contributes significantly to binding affinity but that differences in binding affinity do not completely account for differences in receptor activation. On the basis of these observations, we propose an elaboration of the two-site, two-step model—the “three-step” model—in which initial interactions of the first site result in low-affinity, nonspecific binding; rate-limiting engagement of the second site enables high-affinity, specific binding; and subsequent conformational rearrangement gives rise to receptor activation.",
keywords = "chemokine, chemokine receptor, CCR1, binding, receptor activation, three-step model, cytokine, innate immunity",
author = "Julie Sanchez and Huma, {Zil e} and Lane, {J. Robert} and Xuyu Liu and Bridgford, {Jessica L.} and Payne, {Richard J.} and Meritxell Canals and Stone, {Martin J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1074/jbc.RA118.006535",
language = "English",
volume = "294",
pages = "3464--3475",
journal = "Journal of Biological Chemistry",
issn = "1083-351X",
publisher = "American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology",
number = "10",

}

Evaluation and extension of the two-site, two-step model for binding and activation of the chemokine receptor CCR1. / Sanchez, Julie; Huma, Zil e; Lane, J. Robert; Liu, Xuyu; Bridgford, Jessica L.; Payne, Richard J.; Canals, Meritxell; Stone, Martin J.

In: Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 294, No. 10, 08.03.2019, p. 3464-3475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation and extension of the two-site, two-step model for binding and activation of the chemokine receptor CCR1

AU - Sanchez, Julie

AU - Huma, Zil e

AU - Lane, J. Robert

AU - Liu, Xuyu

AU - Bridgford, Jessica L.

AU - Payne, Richard J.

AU - Canals, Meritxell

AU - Stone, Martin J.

PY - 2019/3/8

Y1 - 2019/3/8

N2 - Interactions between secreted immune proteins called chemokines and their cognate G protein– coupled receptors regulate the trafficking of leukocytes in inflammatory responses. The two-site, two-step model describes these interactions. It involves initial binding of the chemokine N-loop/3 region to the receptor’s N-terminal region and subsequent insertion of the chemokine N-terminal region into the transmembrane helical bundle of the receptor concurrent with receptor activation. Here, we test aspects of this model with C-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) and several chemokine ligands. First, we compared the chemokine-binding affinities of CCR1 with those of peptides corresponding to the CCR1 N-terminal region. Relatively low affinities of the peptides and poor correlations between CCR1 and peptide affinities indicated that other regions of the receptor may contribute to binding affinity. Second, we evaluated the contributions of the two CCR1-interacting regions of the cognate chemokine ligand CCL7 (formerly monocyte chemoattractant protein-3 (MCP-3)) using chimeras between CCL7 and the non-cognate ligand CCL2 (formerly MCP-1). The results revealed that the chemokine N-terminal region contributes significantly to binding affinity but that differences in binding affinity do not completely account for differences in receptor activation. On the basis of these observations, we propose an elaboration of the two-site, two-step model—the “three-step” model—in which initial interactions of the first site result in low-affinity, nonspecific binding; rate-limiting engagement of the second site enables high-affinity, specific binding; and subsequent conformational rearrangement gives rise to receptor activation.

AB - Interactions between secreted immune proteins called chemokines and their cognate G protein– coupled receptors regulate the trafficking of leukocytes in inflammatory responses. The two-site, two-step model describes these interactions. It involves initial binding of the chemokine N-loop/3 region to the receptor’s N-terminal region and subsequent insertion of the chemokine N-terminal region into the transmembrane helical bundle of the receptor concurrent with receptor activation. Here, we test aspects of this model with C-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) and several chemokine ligands. First, we compared the chemokine-binding affinities of CCR1 with those of peptides corresponding to the CCR1 N-terminal region. Relatively low affinities of the peptides and poor correlations between CCR1 and peptide affinities indicated that other regions of the receptor may contribute to binding affinity. Second, we evaluated the contributions of the two CCR1-interacting regions of the cognate chemokine ligand CCL7 (formerly monocyte chemoattractant protein-3 (MCP-3)) using chimeras between CCL7 and the non-cognate ligand CCL2 (formerly MCP-1). The results revealed that the chemokine N-terminal region contributes significantly to binding affinity but that differences in binding affinity do not completely account for differences in receptor activation. On the basis of these observations, we propose an elaboration of the two-site, two-step model—the “three-step” model—in which initial interactions of the first site result in low-affinity, nonspecific binding; rate-limiting engagement of the second site enables high-affinity, specific binding; and subsequent conformational rearrangement gives rise to receptor activation.

KW - chemokine

KW - chemokine receptor

KW - CCR1

KW - binding

KW - receptor activation

KW - three-step model

KW - cytokine

KW - innate immunity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062613402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006535

DO - 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006535

M3 - Article

VL - 294

SP - 3464

EP - 3475

JO - Journal of Biological Chemistry

JF - Journal of Biological Chemistry

SN - 1083-351X

IS - 10

ER -