Evaluating the success of wildlife crossing structures using genetic approaches and an experimental design: Lessons from a gliding mammal

Kylie Soanes, Andrea C. Taylor, Paul Sunnucks, Peter A. Vesk, Silvana Cesarini, Rodney van der Ree

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Millions of dollars are spent on wildlife crossing structures intended to reduce the barrier effects of roads on wildlife. However, we know little about the degree to which these structures facilitate dispersal and gene flow. 

Our study incorporates two elements that are rarely used in the evaluation of wildlife crossing structures: an experimental design including a before and after comparison, and the use of genetic techniques to demonstrate effects on gene flow at both population and individual levels. We evaluated the effect of wildlife crossing structures (canopy bridges and glider poles) on a gliding mammal, the squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis). We genotyped 399 individuals at eight microsatellite markers to analyse population structure, first-generation migrants and parentage relationships. 

We found that the freeway was not a complete genetic barrier, with a strong effect evident at only one site. We hypothesise that the presence of corridors alongside the freeway and throughout the surrounding landscape facilitated circuitous detours for squirrel gliders. 

Installing a crossing structure at the location with a strong barrier effect restored gene flow within just 5 years of mitigation. 

Synthesis and applications. Our study highlights the importance of using genetic techniques not just to evaluate the success of road-crossing structures for wildlife, but also to guide their placement within the landscape. Managers wishing to reduce the effects of linear infrastructure on squirrel gliders and other arboreal mammals should aim to preserve and enhance vegetation along roadsides and within centre medians, as well as mitigate large gaps by implementing wildlife crossing structures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-138
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Keywords

  • BACI
  • canopy bridge
  • fragmentation
  • gap-crossing
  • gene flow
  • glider pole
  • gliding mammals
  • road ecology
  • road mitigation
  • vegetated median
  • wildlife crossing structure

Cite this

Soanes, Kylie ; Taylor, Andrea C. ; Sunnucks, Paul ; Vesk, Peter A. ; Cesarini, Silvana ; van der Ree, Rodney. / Evaluating the success of wildlife crossing structures using genetic approaches and an experimental design : Lessons from a gliding mammal. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2018 ; Vol. 55, No. 1. pp. 129-138.
@article{88ed1f2ea1ca4ab69ac2d3f438c0b9c4,
title = "Evaluating the success of wildlife crossing structures using genetic approaches and an experimental design: Lessons from a gliding mammal",
abstract = "Millions of dollars are spent on wildlife crossing structures intended to reduce the barrier effects of roads on wildlife. However, we know little about the degree to which these structures facilitate dispersal and gene flow. Our study incorporates two elements that are rarely used in the evaluation of wildlife crossing structures: an experimental design including a before and after comparison, and the use of genetic techniques to demonstrate effects on gene flow at both population and individual levels. We evaluated the effect of wildlife crossing structures (canopy bridges and glider poles) on a gliding mammal, the squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis). We genotyped 399 individuals at eight microsatellite markers to analyse population structure, first-generation migrants and parentage relationships. We found that the freeway was not a complete genetic barrier, with a strong effect evident at only one site. We hypothesise that the presence of corridors alongside the freeway and throughout the surrounding landscape facilitated circuitous detours for squirrel gliders. Installing a crossing structure at the location with a strong barrier effect restored gene flow within just 5 years of mitigation. Synthesis and applications. Our study highlights the importance of using genetic techniques not just to evaluate the success of road-crossing structures for wildlife, but also to guide their placement within the landscape. Managers wishing to reduce the effects of linear infrastructure on squirrel gliders and other arboreal mammals should aim to preserve and enhance vegetation along roadsides and within centre medians, as well as mitigate large gaps by implementing wildlife crossing structures.",
keywords = "BACI, canopy bridge, fragmentation, gap-crossing, gene flow, glider pole, gliding mammals, road ecology, road mitigation, vegetated median, wildlife crossing structure",
author = "Kylie Soanes and Taylor, {Andrea C.} and Paul Sunnucks and Vesk, {Peter A.} and Silvana Cesarini and {van der Ree}, Rodney",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.12966",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "129--138",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Evaluating the success of wildlife crossing structures using genetic approaches and an experimental design : Lessons from a gliding mammal. / Soanes, Kylie; Taylor, Andrea C.; Sunnucks, Paul; Vesk, Peter A.; Cesarini, Silvana; van der Ree, Rodney.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 55, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 129-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the success of wildlife crossing structures using genetic approaches and an experimental design

T2 - Lessons from a gliding mammal

AU - Soanes, Kylie

AU - Taylor, Andrea C.

AU - Sunnucks, Paul

AU - Vesk, Peter A.

AU - Cesarini, Silvana

AU - van der Ree, Rodney

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Millions of dollars are spent on wildlife crossing structures intended to reduce the barrier effects of roads on wildlife. However, we know little about the degree to which these structures facilitate dispersal and gene flow. Our study incorporates two elements that are rarely used in the evaluation of wildlife crossing structures: an experimental design including a before and after comparison, and the use of genetic techniques to demonstrate effects on gene flow at both population and individual levels. We evaluated the effect of wildlife crossing structures (canopy bridges and glider poles) on a gliding mammal, the squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis). We genotyped 399 individuals at eight microsatellite markers to analyse population structure, first-generation migrants and parentage relationships. We found that the freeway was not a complete genetic barrier, with a strong effect evident at only one site. We hypothesise that the presence of corridors alongside the freeway and throughout the surrounding landscape facilitated circuitous detours for squirrel gliders. Installing a crossing structure at the location with a strong barrier effect restored gene flow within just 5 years of mitigation. Synthesis and applications. Our study highlights the importance of using genetic techniques not just to evaluate the success of road-crossing structures for wildlife, but also to guide their placement within the landscape. Managers wishing to reduce the effects of linear infrastructure on squirrel gliders and other arboreal mammals should aim to preserve and enhance vegetation along roadsides and within centre medians, as well as mitigate large gaps by implementing wildlife crossing structures.

AB - Millions of dollars are spent on wildlife crossing structures intended to reduce the barrier effects of roads on wildlife. However, we know little about the degree to which these structures facilitate dispersal and gene flow. Our study incorporates two elements that are rarely used in the evaluation of wildlife crossing structures: an experimental design including a before and after comparison, and the use of genetic techniques to demonstrate effects on gene flow at both population and individual levels. We evaluated the effect of wildlife crossing structures (canopy bridges and glider poles) on a gliding mammal, the squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis). We genotyped 399 individuals at eight microsatellite markers to analyse population structure, first-generation migrants and parentage relationships. We found that the freeway was not a complete genetic barrier, with a strong effect evident at only one site. We hypothesise that the presence of corridors alongside the freeway and throughout the surrounding landscape facilitated circuitous detours for squirrel gliders. Installing a crossing structure at the location with a strong barrier effect restored gene flow within just 5 years of mitigation. Synthesis and applications. Our study highlights the importance of using genetic techniques not just to evaluate the success of road-crossing structures for wildlife, but also to guide their placement within the landscape. Managers wishing to reduce the effects of linear infrastructure on squirrel gliders and other arboreal mammals should aim to preserve and enhance vegetation along roadsides and within centre medians, as well as mitigate large gaps by implementing wildlife crossing structures.

KW - BACI

KW - canopy bridge

KW - fragmentation

KW - gap-crossing

KW - gene flow

KW - glider pole

KW - gliding mammals

KW - road ecology

KW - road mitigation

KW - vegetated median

KW - wildlife crossing structure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037692887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.12966

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.12966

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 129

EP - 138

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 1

ER -