Evaluating rider steering responses to an unexpected collision hazard using a motorcycle riding simulator

Marilee Nugent, Giovanni Savino, Christine Mulvihill, Mike Lenné, Michael Fitzharris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Motorcycle rider steer responses to unexpected collision emergencies have not been studied experimentally. We used a motorcycle simulator with elastic steer mechanism and modified car driving model to simulate the input-output counter steering response of two-wheeled vehicles in combination with a car pop-up paradigm from driving studies to evaluate rider responses to unexpected collision hazards. We manipulated time-to-crash – either 1 s or 1.5 s – to probe the threshold between not enough and just enough time to respond. The median response time of 570 ms was similar to previously recorded latencies for motorcycle emergency braking responses. Although median response time and steer torque did not depend on time-to-crash (TTC), the distribution and variability of response measures were increased when TTC was shorter. Riders showed improved lateral displacement toward the road centerline by the third TTC1.5 trial and were almost 8 times more likely to produce a successful virtual swerve avoidance maneuver in TTC1.5 rather than TTC1 trials. With 1.5 s to respond, riders were more consistent, with net steering inputs more congruent with the maneuvering goal compared to when they had only 1 s to respond. Comparisons of ‘safe’ versus ‘crash’ outcomes show that average response times across trials and riders are not different, but the variance in timing is lower across successful trials. We have shown than it is possible to safely study rider reactions to an emergency and observe a realistic range of steer responses to a traffic conflict using a motorcycle riding simulator. The results have relevance for the design of automatic rider assistive systems, rider behavior prediction and decision logic algorithms, PTW rider modeling and targeted training interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)292-309
Number of pages18
JournalTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Volume66
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Keywords

  • Collision avoidance
  • Emergency maneuver
  • Motorcycle rider
  • Response time
  • Simulator
  • Steering

Cite this

@article{3da141b9ae1b4424aa34fdbd7754c0eb,
title = "Evaluating rider steering responses to an unexpected collision hazard using a motorcycle riding simulator",
abstract = "Motorcycle rider steer responses to unexpected collision emergencies have not been studied experimentally. We used a motorcycle simulator with elastic steer mechanism and modified car driving model to simulate the input-output counter steering response of two-wheeled vehicles in combination with a car pop-up paradigm from driving studies to evaluate rider responses to unexpected collision hazards. We manipulated time-to-crash – either 1 s or 1.5 s – to probe the threshold between not enough and just enough time to respond. The median response time of 570 ms was similar to previously recorded latencies for motorcycle emergency braking responses. Although median response time and steer torque did not depend on time-to-crash (TTC), the distribution and variability of response measures were increased when TTC was shorter. Riders showed improved lateral displacement toward the road centerline by the third TTC1.5 trial and were almost 8 times more likely to produce a successful virtual swerve avoidance maneuver in TTC1.5 rather than TTC1 trials. With 1.5 s to respond, riders were more consistent, with net steering inputs more congruent with the maneuvering goal compared to when they had only 1 s to respond. Comparisons of ‘safe’ versus ‘crash’ outcomes show that average response times across trials and riders are not different, but the variance in timing is lower across successful trials. We have shown than it is possible to safely study rider reactions to an emergency and observe a realistic range of steer responses to a traffic conflict using a motorcycle riding simulator. The results have relevance for the design of automatic rider assistive systems, rider behavior prediction and decision logic algorithms, PTW rider modeling and targeted training interventions.",
keywords = "Collision avoidance, Emergency maneuver, Motorcycle rider, Response time, Simulator, Steering",
author = "Marilee Nugent and Giovanni Savino and Christine Mulvihill and Mike Lenn{\'e} and Michael Fitzharris",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.005",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "292--309",
journal = "Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour",
issn = "1369-8478",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Evaluating rider steering responses to an unexpected collision hazard using a motorcycle riding simulator. / Nugent, Marilee; Savino, Giovanni; Mulvihill, Christine; Lenné, Mike; Fitzharris, Michael.

In: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 66, 10.2019, p. 292-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating rider steering responses to an unexpected collision hazard using a motorcycle riding simulator

AU - Nugent, Marilee

AU - Savino, Giovanni

AU - Mulvihill, Christine

AU - Lenné, Mike

AU - Fitzharris, Michael

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Motorcycle rider steer responses to unexpected collision emergencies have not been studied experimentally. We used a motorcycle simulator with elastic steer mechanism and modified car driving model to simulate the input-output counter steering response of two-wheeled vehicles in combination with a car pop-up paradigm from driving studies to evaluate rider responses to unexpected collision hazards. We manipulated time-to-crash – either 1 s or 1.5 s – to probe the threshold between not enough and just enough time to respond. The median response time of 570 ms was similar to previously recorded latencies for motorcycle emergency braking responses. Although median response time and steer torque did not depend on time-to-crash (TTC), the distribution and variability of response measures were increased when TTC was shorter. Riders showed improved lateral displacement toward the road centerline by the third TTC1.5 trial and were almost 8 times more likely to produce a successful virtual swerve avoidance maneuver in TTC1.5 rather than TTC1 trials. With 1.5 s to respond, riders were more consistent, with net steering inputs more congruent with the maneuvering goal compared to when they had only 1 s to respond. Comparisons of ‘safe’ versus ‘crash’ outcomes show that average response times across trials and riders are not different, but the variance in timing is lower across successful trials. We have shown than it is possible to safely study rider reactions to an emergency and observe a realistic range of steer responses to a traffic conflict using a motorcycle riding simulator. The results have relevance for the design of automatic rider assistive systems, rider behavior prediction and decision logic algorithms, PTW rider modeling and targeted training interventions.

AB - Motorcycle rider steer responses to unexpected collision emergencies have not been studied experimentally. We used a motorcycle simulator with elastic steer mechanism and modified car driving model to simulate the input-output counter steering response of two-wheeled vehicles in combination with a car pop-up paradigm from driving studies to evaluate rider responses to unexpected collision hazards. We manipulated time-to-crash – either 1 s or 1.5 s – to probe the threshold between not enough and just enough time to respond. The median response time of 570 ms was similar to previously recorded latencies for motorcycle emergency braking responses. Although median response time and steer torque did not depend on time-to-crash (TTC), the distribution and variability of response measures were increased when TTC was shorter. Riders showed improved lateral displacement toward the road centerline by the third TTC1.5 trial and were almost 8 times more likely to produce a successful virtual swerve avoidance maneuver in TTC1.5 rather than TTC1 trials. With 1.5 s to respond, riders were more consistent, with net steering inputs more congruent with the maneuvering goal compared to when they had only 1 s to respond. Comparisons of ‘safe’ versus ‘crash’ outcomes show that average response times across trials and riders are not different, but the variance in timing is lower across successful trials. We have shown than it is possible to safely study rider reactions to an emergency and observe a realistic range of steer responses to a traffic conflict using a motorcycle riding simulator. The results have relevance for the design of automatic rider assistive systems, rider behavior prediction and decision logic algorithms, PTW rider modeling and targeted training interventions.

KW - Collision avoidance

KW - Emergency maneuver

KW - Motorcycle rider

KW - Response time

KW - Simulator

KW - Steering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072319527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.005

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 292

EP - 309

JO - Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

JF - Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

SN - 1369-8478

ER -