Evaluating restorative justice programs in Taiwan

Hsiao-Fen Huang, Yao-chung Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


This paper aims to evaluate four restorative justice programs in Taiwan: (1) a mediation system; (2) deferred prosecution and conditional suspended sentence; (3) a youth justice system; and (4) the Taiwan Restorative Justice Initiative. In this paper, models proposed in Marshall (Restorative justice: An overview. London: Home Office, 1999) and Braithwaite (British Journal of Criminology 42:563577, 2002b) are used as criteria to evaluate the four programs. Based on governmental documents, official statistics, and the findings of previous empirical studies, this paper will examine whose needs and power is focused and what types of value are highlighted in those four programs. This paper finds that current restorative justice programs in Taiwan place greater emphasis on offenders than on other parties such as victims and communities. In addition, maximizing and emergent standards that Braithwaite identifies are implemented more in Taiwan s restorative justice programs than constraining standards. This paper suggests that restorative justice practices in Taiwan need to be more concerned with victims needs and interests, and to strengthen constraining types of restorative justice values. (c) 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297 - 307
Number of pages11
JournalAsian Journal of Criminology
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Cite this