TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating programs for young people with a family member with mental health challenges
T2 - protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation
AU - Reupert, Andrea
AU - Freeman, Nerelie
AU - Hine, Rochelle
AU - Lea, Sophie
AU - Nandakumar, Nivedita
AU - O’Grady, Charlotte
AU - Patlamazoglou, Lefteris
AU - Pettenuzzo, Laura
AU - Foster, Kim
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge Lottie O’Dea and Rose Cuff, both from Satellite, for coordinating the work with the Satellite Youth Advisory Council and providing background information about Satellite.
Funding Information:
AR, KF, LPa, SL, NF, NN, RH receive funding from the Victorian Department of Health to evaluate the Satellite Foundation. LPe and CO are members of the Satellite Youth Advisory Committee and in that capacity receive funding from Satellite.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Crown.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Young people with a sibling or parent who experiences mental health challenges have their own support needs. Most programs designed for this population lack a strong evidence base, and the involvement of young people in the development and evaluation of programs designed to support them is unclear or lacking. Methods: This paper describes a protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation of a suite of programs delivered by The Satellite Foundation, a not-for-profit organisation for young people (5–25 years) who have a family member with mental health challenges. Young people’s lived experience and knowledge will guide the research approach. Institutional ethics approval has been obtained. Over a three year period, approximately 150 young people will be surveyed online on various wellbeing outcome measures, prior to, six and twelve months following program participation with data analysed using multi-level modelling. Groups of young people will be interviewed after participating in different Satellite programs each year. An additional group of young people will be interviewed individually over time. Transcripts will be analysed using thematic analysis. Young people’s creative artworks on their experiences will be included as part of the evaluation data. Discussion: This novel, collaborative evaluation will provide vital evidence on young people’s experiences and outcomes during their time with Satellite. Findings will be used to inform future program development and policy. The approach used here may guide other researchers engaging in collaborative evaluations with community organisations.
AB - Background: Young people with a sibling or parent who experiences mental health challenges have their own support needs. Most programs designed for this population lack a strong evidence base, and the involvement of young people in the development and evaluation of programs designed to support them is unclear or lacking. Methods: This paper describes a protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation of a suite of programs delivered by The Satellite Foundation, a not-for-profit organisation for young people (5–25 years) who have a family member with mental health challenges. Young people’s lived experience and knowledge will guide the research approach. Institutional ethics approval has been obtained. Over a three year period, approximately 150 young people will be surveyed online on various wellbeing outcome measures, prior to, six and twelve months following program participation with data analysed using multi-level modelling. Groups of young people will be interviewed after participating in different Satellite programs each year. An additional group of young people will be interviewed individually over time. Transcripts will be analysed using thematic analysis. Young people’s creative artworks on their experiences will be included as part of the evaluation data. Discussion: This novel, collaborative evaluation will provide vital evidence on young people’s experiences and outcomes during their time with Satellite. Findings will be used to inform future program development and policy. The approach used here may guide other researchers engaging in collaborative evaluations with community organisations.
KW - Evaluation
KW - Mixed methods
KW - Participatory; parental mental illness
KW - Youth mental health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149932047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40359-023-01104-7
DO - 10.1186/s40359-023-01104-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 36899413
AN - SCOPUS:85149932047
SN - 2050-7283
VL - 11
JO - BMC Psychology
JF - BMC Psychology
IS - 1
M1 - 67
ER -