Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating combined assurance as a new credibility enhancement technique

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

One of the challenges associated with emerging forms of external reporting is finding efficient and effective means to enhance the credibility of these reports (IAASB 2016). This study examines a novel credibility-enhancing mechanism, combined assurance (CA), where the credibility-enhancing processes of the internal auditor, the external auditor, and the effectiveness of risk management and internal controls and processes are publicly reported by the company (audit committee). We identify the most appropriate setting currently available (Integrated Reporting in South Africa) to examine whether there are benefits associated with communicating the details of CA within companies’ integrated reports. We find that communicating the details of CA is beneficial in reducing both analysts’ forecast errors and dispersion, and also in reducing the bid–ask spread for companies where the information environment is weaker. The implications of these findings for regulators, standard-setters, assurance providers, and users of extended external reports are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-259
Number of pages25
JournalAuditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Analyst forecasts
  • Assurance
  • Bid-ask spreads
  • Combined assurance
  • Information asymmetry
  • Integrated reporting

Cite this