Evaluating autoselection methods used for choosing solutions from pareto-optimal set: does nondominance persist from calibration to validation phase?

Gift Dumedah; Aaron A Berg; Mark Wineberg

doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000389

Evaluating autoselection methods used for choosing solutions from pareto-optimal set: does nondominance persist from calibration to validation phase?

Gift Dumedah
, Aaron A Berg
, Mark Wineberg

Civil & Environmental Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	150-159
Number of pages	10
Journal	Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume	17
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000389
Publication status	Published - 2012

Access to Document

10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000389

Cite this

@article{21451ff20e20472393bbc2341a268ecb,

title = "Evaluating autoselection methods used for choosing solutions from pareto-optimal set: does nondominance persist from calibration to validation phase?",

author = "Gift Dumedah and Berg, \{Aaron A\} and Mark Wineberg",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000389",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "150--159",

journal = "Journal of Hydrologic Engineering",

issn = "1084-0699",