| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | International Encyclopedia of Public Health |
| Editors | Stella R. Quah, William Cockerham |
| Place of Publication | Amsterdam Netherlands |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Pages | 11-16 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Edition | 2nd |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780128037089 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780128036785 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Abstract
Ethical issues in infectious disease control sometimes arise when public health measures required to maximally promote public health conflict with basic human rights and liberties. While neither the promotion of the greater good in the way of public health nor the protection of individuals should always be given absolute priority over the other, trade-offs must be made between the two. These issues are explored through examination of controversy surrounding informed consent, mandatory vaccination and treatment, and quarantine. Infectious diseases also raise issues of social justice insofar as they disproportionately affect the poor. Public health crises involving infectious diseases, finally, may sometimes raise distinctive, context-specific issues. Much debate about pandemic influenza has focused on questions about health workers' duty to treat potentially contagious patients and the just allocation of scarce resources; the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa raised new questions about the use and study of unregistered interventions; and the Zika crisis in South America has highlighted the ethical importance of reproductive liberty.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Allocation of resources
- Duty to treat
- Ebola
- Ethics
- Freedom
- HIV/AIDS
- Human experimentation
- Human rights
- Informed consent
- Liberty
- Mandatory treatment
- Mandatory vaccination
- Quarantine
- Tuberculosis
- Zika
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver